Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Interface Identifiers
Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Tue, 03 September 2013 23:07 UTC
Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59D9721F9477 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:07:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.641
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.641 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.042, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Mc7xSPAFqhct for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pd0-x22a.google.com (mail-pd0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c02::22a]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D98CC21F99CD for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Sep 2013 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id x10so6678001pdj.29 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=n7PPCT983jYbEYF64H8QKo01yGEDTYQSdJ4D7Qa5AaI=; b=boXxXF1LuKaTGUGMPRS9Fwm35A9QF5ha755V0SjVJJYxnymXUfNXCaFMDbwzaaN9dL 0Q1maX5gsZUqTO2DJEj9FKyYdRHCOzBlBpHeVDDRn+Fxy6ZOo8ejHkujO6xLU8Acc5J5 Y8YJBUFiuHLaMT0LQWJ31t+gMUSkfCQ4uWvZCXMwqALklZF54IJPc0Vpc45HvdVm9K9a kU4vz6DDjqCk590tI+Btt2VJK0hN8IqtRjsNR1P7WG0XShVmjQUKfoKrR1yPzvo1NkrX OvoTDkG9HzCi0URnFxYACslEBOl7sXKQ4ETz7u+v6sQmrjc1fZCd91+LEQhYNIs4Bobu aGTA==
X-Received: by 10.66.155.36 with SMTP id vt4mr34500270pab.93.1378249626592; Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:07:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.178.20] (250.200.69.111.dynamic.snap.net.nz. [111.69.200.250]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id w6sm24896293pbt.32.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Sep 2013 16:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <52266B9B.2030001@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Sep 2013 11:07:07 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (Windows/20070728)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ran Atkinson <ran.atkinson@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Interface Identifiers
References: <AD30B725-8CAB-47F0-A79F-0BBA93F47FDB@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <AD30B725-8CAB-47F0-A79F-0BBA93F47FDB@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 23:07:07 -0000
Ran, On 04/09/2013 10:38, Ran Atkinson wrote: > I'd like to see Ray Hunter's proposed text added > to the I-D, rather than being summarised. The authors will of course do whatever the WG wants on this. However, we also have a query out to the IEEE 802.1 liaison, so it make sense to wait for that. Brian > > I find the detail quite useful. Honestly, it is a more clear > justification/motivation for this significant specification > change than anything else I've yet seen. So I believe that > most other readers also would find that detail useful. > > In short, I disagree with Brian's inclination to summarise > Ray's text, rather than include it, and I concur with Ray > Hunter's proposal. > > Yours, > > Ran > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Interface… Fernando Gont
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Randy Bush
- Re: Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 I… Ray Hunter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Ray Hunter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Ray Hunter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Ran Atkinson
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… RJ Atkinson
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Ray Hunter
- Re: Detailed review of Significance of IPv6 Inter… Brian E Carpenter