Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt

Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com> Mon, 17 February 2020 14:14 UTC

Return-Path: <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AF94120846 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:14:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kzlt7itXSTNT for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qv1-xf34.google.com (mail-qv1-xf34.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::f34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 88AA9120809 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:14:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qv1-xf34.google.com with SMTP id p2so7617673qvo.10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:14:30 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=r5e21emhroIK2Z+EIsLh9p5fAfTisPFikF3a8avbQ4Y=; b=mOUdj/xVh/j3uyLeP3o/69Xgqt5Nr+y3Cse3Kn8JPcGAu8Du6l2aL8e+V8Ut2il8aH SIQLv9Km5IgGEAUMnefNFow5dE6LthjmzBk7FyO1UzU9rPai9cmNfdEHnA9CZf7ju2Qu dr49TKb+FTm9279jTVWaMQjrkdJnM8zUaWLGfYceCzsGKZmfOvTi8trN/jM+Qva6oPd0 F60J6hUxoTc8Vq699zPfqI+GilLqyIbAOQczC3BagQlAjY4y0GPXK9k/9BsO57km+9ru p5TESQUFp6vNFF3klfB2onz6HSRpFcu8GOj6x3ehzAygJYmbxqpOYeGyloJpaL3G531P +8pA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=r5e21emhroIK2Z+EIsLh9p5fAfTisPFikF3a8avbQ4Y=; b=ML6jZ0WtSDQF/vicukJZqsB4R8fJvC2f1+so3v+JF15/paMmHsHn7A4om1HMwecYp/ G1JUh8Js+WZVA/vVa0HUtcMMh81CyCcz0XJ1TUY5mG1XuOUE/3qvLrMLjAHnzYKlXaIM RLTZHFaxym90lBGFuM4X9qRLWxykYiI3Lv5VJjfEjNf3s0Sv/jJQHzwnTSX6jMbL8no1 Xfq5bUvKJFmpk4sxxrZhpJtmk3IKYKDtzEMEZK1F8YkY9LCTP4wosRbVoma+XLf24GdI D9sQoIpC+clvHyMozOSL8Up+QaXNBbHDRp/E4Mc6KkTV50Ksyf/7KCQLssvbW7pUaH9n eDyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWfO91Gchdosu0pTIWJRV4szacly1mHLXh/pNXLSxl/H0plZ9eX hRDjmu28lnTXgsmuf5ulEbSWx4QXkU6RUjI+1T0YmA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySOwVY/TtRHDmHUDqssi64N5v2wJMhxfgDf1LPtOHKm1T6QxMagjBohi53H4orxdqiQ1FISI6M4cZPIA8t1xg=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:a910:: with SMTP id y16mr12893428qva.139.1581948869134; Mon, 17 Feb 2020 06:14:29 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <158190033563.5886.42675587901100238.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <DM6PR05MB6348721798E28750373994C0AE160@DM6PR05MB6348.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <DBBPR03MB541583CE6FB3F4FE557EB2AEEE160@DBBPR03MB5415.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <C56D3C54-68EE-4F6C-8A4B-CF6022F29CA9@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <C56D3C54-68EE-4F6C-8A4B-CF6022F29CA9@juniper.net>
From: Chris Bowers <chrisbowers.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 08:11:53 -0600
Message-ID: <CAHzoHbsHeHsySdPYc3yJZiMA761xGuWLiL5nHR+2femX_AFECg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
To: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Cc: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Julian Lucek <jlucek=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000065ce6d059ec62c9f"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/BhUoIJx3pBcIArc_WLJTAbaY0AA>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2020 14:14:40 -0000

+1 I think it makes sense for the WG to adopt this draft.

Chris

On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 5:58 AM Julian Lucek <jlucek=
40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:

> +1
>
>
>
> 6man should adopt this draft because:
>
>
>
> (i) It has been around for a year
>
> (ii) It has been implemented on experimental code versions: LINUX Server
> (software-based forwarding) and MX series router (ASIC-based forwarding)
>
> (iii) It has had some experimental deployments, as well as Liquid, in some
> other, as yet unnamed, networks
>
>
>
> Julian
>
>
>
> *From: *ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> on behalf of Andrew Alston <
> Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>
> *Date: *Monday, 17 February 2020 at 11:45
> *To: *Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>rg>, 6man WG <
> ipv6@ietf.org>
> *Subject: *RE: New Version Notification for
> draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
>
>
>
> As a co-author of this document, I fully support this change.  We have
> stated many times that we have a need for this technology – and in fact
> have done significant work internally to use this technology – inclusive of
> tests to steer traffic between asn’s and other things.
>
>
>
> Thanks Ron for the work on this.
>
>
>
> Andrew
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> *On Behalf Of *Ron Bonica
> *Sent:* Monday, 17 February 2020 03:56
> *To:* 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
> *Subject:* FW: New Version Notification for
> draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
>
>
>
> Folks,
>
> Over the last several weeks, customers who have no interest in Segment
> Routing have expressed interest in the CRH. So, we have updated the CRH
> draft, removing all references to Segment Routing and letting it stand
> alone as an IPv6 Routing header.
>
> While Segment Routing may one day be a user of the CRH, it will not be the
> only user.
>
> Please review this document as a stand-alone piece of work.
>
> Ron
>
>
>
> Juniper Business Use Only
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internet-drafts@ietf.org <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
> Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2020 7:46 PM
> To: Ron Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>et>; Ning So <ning.so@ril.com>om>; Andrew
> Alston <andrew.alston@liquidtelecom.com>om>; Ning So <Ning.So@ril.com>om>;
> Tomonobu Niwa <to-niwa@kddi.com>om>; Andrew Alston <
> Andrew.Alston@liquidtelecom.com>gt;; Yuji Kamite <y.kamite@ntt.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
>
>
> A new version of I-D, draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11.txt
> has been successfully submitted by Ron Bonica and posted to the IETF
> repository.
>
> Name: draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr
> Revision: 11
> Title: The IPv6 Compressed Routing Header (CRH)
> Document date: 2020-02-16
> Group: Individual Submission
> Pages: 16
> URL https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XkLwpNbt_lW0zdMC3zBSxB88VXWxHgJ8TnckKpe9_FSeDWas7BKUD1BH05HFYzWY$>
> Status: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr/
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XkLwpNbt_lW0zdMC3zBSxB88VXWxHgJ8TnckKpe9_FSeDWas7BKUD1BH0w3nJEqm$>
> Htmlized: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr-11__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XkLwpNbt_lW0zdMC3zBSxB88VXWxHgJ8TnckKpe9_FSeDWas7BKUD1BH05HFYzWY$>
> Htmlized:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-bonica-6man-comp-rtg-hdr__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XkLwpNbt_lW0zdMC3zBSxB88VXWxHgJ8TnckKpe9_FSeDWas7BKUD1BH0_p5lJrd$>
> Diff:
> Abstract:
> This document defines two new Routing header types. Collectively,
> they are called the Compressed Routing Headers (CRH). Individually,
> they are called CRH-16 and CRH-32.
>
>
>
>
> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at
> tools.ietf.org.
>
> The IETF Secretariat
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> <https://urldefense.com/v3/__https:/www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!XkLwpNbt_lW0zdMC3zBSxB88VXWxHgJ8TnckKpe9_FSeDWas7BKUD1BH01zTmF8y$>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>