Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091)

[Brian Haberman <[e-mail]>]

On 1/16/12 6:26 PM, RFC Errata System wrote:
> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6434,
> "IPv6 Node Requirements".
>
> --------------------------------------
> You may review the report below and at:
> http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6434&eid=3091
>
> --------------------------------------
> Type: Editorial
> Reported by: Sam Silvester<[e-mail]>
>
> Section: 5.10.
>
> Original Text
> -------------
> Nodes supporting applications that expect to only take advantage of MLDv2's INCLUDE functionality as well as Any-Source Multicast will find it sufficient to support MLDv2 as defined in [RFC5790].
>
> Corrected Text
> --------------
> Nodes supporting applications that expect to only take advantage of MLDv2's INCLUDE functionality as well as Any-Source Multicast will find it sufficient to support Lightweight MLDv2 as defined in [RFC5790].
>
> Notes
> -----
> MLDv2 is RFC3810, and has both INCLUDE and EXCLUDE filter modes (as per previous paragraph.
>
> RFC5790 (Lightweight MLDv2) is sufficient for nodes supporting application using only INCLUDE and Any-Source Multicast.
>
> Instructions:
> -------------
> This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
> use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
> rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
> can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary.
>
> --------------------------------------
> RFC6434 (draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11)
> --------------------------------------
> Title               : IPv6 Node Requirements
> Publication Date    : December 2011
> Author(s)           : E. Jankiewicz, J. Loughney, T. Narten
> Category            : INFORMATIONAL
> Source              : IPv6 Maintenance
> Area                : Internet
> Stream              : IETF
> Verifying Party     : IESG

I am not sure there is a benefit to adding a single adjective to the 
noted sentence.  The actual reference is correct, so the reader will be 
correctly directed to the Lightweight MLD specification.

Regards,
Brian