[Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091)
RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Mon, 16 January 2012 23:29 UTC
Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D261321F86DF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:29:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.438
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.438 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.162, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QwBbgetlEiWc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D2C21F85EF for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:29:04 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id 377C8B1E007; Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:26:06 -0800 (PST)
To: edward.jankiewicz@sri.com, john.loughney@nokia.com, narten@us.ibm.com, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, jari.arkko@piuha.net, bob.hinden@gmail.com, brian@innovationslab.net
Subject: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091)
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120116232606.377C8B1E007@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 15:26:06 -0800
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2012 23:29:05 -0000
The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6434, "IPv6 Node Requirements". -------------------------------------- You may review the report below and at: http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6434&eid=3091 -------------------------------------- Type: Editorial Reported by: Sam Silvester <sam.silvester@gmail.com> Section: 5.10. Original Text ------------- Nodes supporting applications that expect to only take advantage of MLDv2's INCLUDE functionality as well as Any-Source Multicast will find it sufficient to support MLDv2 as defined in [RFC5790]. Corrected Text -------------- Nodes supporting applications that expect to only take advantage of MLDv2's INCLUDE functionality as well as Any-Source Multicast will find it sufficient to support Lightweight MLDv2 as defined in [RFC5790]. Notes ----- MLDv2 is RFC3810, and has both INCLUDE and EXCLUDE filter modes (as per previous paragraph. RFC5790 (Lightweight MLDv2) is sufficient for nodes supporting application using only INCLUDE and Any-Source Multicast. Instructions: ------------- This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG) can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. -------------------------------------- RFC6434 (draft-ietf-6man-node-req-bis-11) -------------------------------------- Title : IPv6 Node Requirements Publication Date : December 2011 Author(s) : E. Jankiewicz, J. Loughney, T. Narten Category : INFORMATIONAL Source : IPv6 Maintenance Area : Internet Stream : IETF Verifying Party : IESG
- [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) RFC Errata System
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) Brian Haberman
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) Sam Silvester
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) Brian Haberman
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) Thomas Narten
- RE: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) john.loughney
- Re: [Editorial Errata Reported] RFC6434 (3091) Tom Taylor