Re: DNS AAAA for free

James R Cutler <james.cutler@consultant.com> Sat, 09 April 2016 14:32 UTC

Return-Path: <james.cutler@consultant.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57FF12B006; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:32:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MQs-UXVcYPWH; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.gmx.com (mout.gmx.com [74.208.4.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 49E6A12009C; Sat, 9 Apr 2016 07:32:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.44] ([68.41.30.73]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmxus002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0Lhwwu-1bc04e1ZTe-00n9FX; Sat, 09 Apr 2016 16:32:50 +0200
Subject: Re: DNS AAAA for free
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D86F9F83-0695-4243-A2DB-E6C5CEF6F5F7"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: James R Cutler <james.cutler@consultant.com>
In-Reply-To: <8BE0F8C3-D08E-487E-A12D-508C822337BB@steffann.nl>
Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 10:32:38 -0400
Message-Id: <CFE92148-462D-497A-B633-534AA3CB0ACB@consultant.com>
References: <07DA627D-867F-45AD-BF43-400CB06458CC@employees.org> <8BE0F8C3-D08E-487E-A12D-508C822337BB@steffann.nl>
To: otroan@employees.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:7rmSkndSw0EZSZnsxx8K+v7Uw70VJNQCS5MFP15vq9HANoSPC6h I2AfiiFKuBjHW5AK7HTpEoOFdPb+NT1/hCTSIKEV15VYqYreQjlQon+F7UAjsrxsC+WLs2Y AvSBPo+efpkUWI3qDjTqC9nhSJdvjqoCpZslTnZiJgwE3R01tbCmxqnaVLQjOggB37hbhZx Vx7bVPbKjlykcdZyF7wvw==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:OmGe4s2nb2M=:XDEl8/LLCI0ht2bKsVQQ/T R6RgG5yD1OlSog26LsoyW+6+y3ZsAPwmgQ4D1ENVy3ElYoNEKzXuPmkjt0Q+qgSnY7NQWixxr 5pmcmC6n7U2HYb3jkEgrpdJEqIO8HMXRQI/co6BippiFbWipxnRpVtjeaOMQ5DH4KIAITlfFy yk7XKvHU/WbIcJx5VPe0th+mG7g0b5KQ9V9Gstq/2CWvMkGXiRjIcDQw4iRiQCMZLltva0mzC amo2xORifW2AeLNv/mWF4dZri8CG+ZjoQHW5bi3ozDnEQOJZQ52JNBnD2L4przFcVQsyxIjob Nh9uuqLbtG/uGpG6GpfQY6U63dCHWml5sZySc1UAMkLgy5QmCqt3+CE/pBlZfie2k7BDAVzVU yqH/VnpEFubE8ufUM7jhPyhoWHD142yppT3Y35wJybndj8tTdjpZa9yaQ14pGY3S8qzIgUEFL /ewfIe7aSihVWUlahvgwjS48igfPmdDCc55hO2vAVtvCtU95VN5GRNjnnrruMoN6O+ayVxHw6 vpDwg7sS/rKowSQcdk4OqVj+bZYREjIG53KbLCtJbMdl6K5BsXW19OG08pud+icmBLwv6FyKQ eCvpe605eMw6OXSnobLDkudeBMckhP76AWqix0LcP2sc7BCmAqa6p5Wv/mGsGmdotOCYbh76u 2h0zGuESkfJ6x+yLlRR4Q2JCgHot9FKPobvr7warR8HPq4bhqnCPSeJhKCA/rjw0MYGbasmvS LMTOOYuOT7HaXu+LaMvJCm3dNUuRDvMXAOuzqm6U4616ghbo6NA5uAh6aN8=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/EV2YwXiYOONlfreAGLubAITpMIQ>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2016 14:32:58 -0000

On 08 Apr 2016, at 13:27, otroan@employees.org <mailto:otroan@employees.org> wrote:
> 
> Here is an interesting draft being presented in dnsop today.
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free/?include_text=1 <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-vavrusa-dnsop-aaaa-for-free/?include_text=1>
> 
> The proposal is to allow AAAA records in response to A queries.

In most conversations it is considered polite to answer the question asked and not to provide confusing extra data. This proposal violates that.

James R. Cutler
James.cutler@consultant.com
PGP keys at http://pgp.mit.edu