Re: draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-01

Erik Kline <ek@loon.co> Mon, 25 March 2019 07:18 UTC

Return-Path: <ek@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 906E8120364 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:18:10 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -9.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=loon.co
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id eolT-x78gPLF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CFF1A120360 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id u12so6736692iop.11 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:18:08 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=loon.co; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=IfhNov/sIjnX4S3jMLL4PCVRt/AoMIrgPWcvgLOw8tE=; b=mYwQSkyahQAt64KibLGgP7VjUoXIZKLgMBTaWQn8xYC8YY5sxqwCY9wM+UqTtIYv1H q8tfOaMYEjSED+LFj3txNGg13zxqsXpgdxlNqCGCVgv6jXg3g88nZ2zEfUOMwfB69FXM n/oJzOGJonLbWU2w73yya0fa5dVs+gqjlPw7U=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=IfhNov/sIjnX4S3jMLL4PCVRt/AoMIrgPWcvgLOw8tE=; b=ISohfdPPkwOsUC6ODWUEm8Zj0MwpngFFmVSJ6rMidzLzUEGFz4ihVqWy1vtK9BvNTc +XqPsviAEnBE38oCiuxFXLgq5hKkJ2xFixAzOna/YbCtsYOjh8LMh4sxThWTCTYNY+ys 8shrYnIAN9O1av0UPqDe8KSkkQ183KYHmgNYIw9kJBviQgmqw9/iBup62yQjA5C9RMe3 vrQpqaZEsKz8sK4G6fo7rldQ2Da6ZRW0V43uD7yBsHtR6wGmqF2OfHOZYoPcfADU6/Tt Pf5rML89tRVAm8Cb2FHx32OdRETEMHoEuNod1xzHQDYYVhP9E10J+E0ziKnnuqInJxiZ muoQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWoUnDlW18cfRJsyrpIHZDM8Sv8LiOBjyR7+SBj8WVNIx829z+2 Ci1SWXVpYAe9ouOPYzG9oMyDH66lJ6hzJiDvV3TBWQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzWwn45loC3TV3fFzoqLbpHTIy6gyOauKRhoF9/h/4rYdjEAyXZas/LC1bIdkhiepWq+Y62U2bSN0Gmcs/5g2Y=
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:824e:: with SMTP id n14mr15446112ioo.16.1553498287817; Mon, 25 Mar 2019 00:18:07 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <da050573-8a39-5dd1-c54f-d5faf2da469b@asgard.org> <ab7fae17-f620-fb97-01b6-b9a92c73dd0f@si6networks.com> <CAAedzxq__bZiX+vg9mKd6MEo0qV9N_oo9B7Q-api3+S-j7gx6Q@mail.gmail.com> <331182dd-fcba-c6f4-5031-d30bc70d5131@gmail.com> <12C1C38B-711E-4396-84EB-DAC4FF8A7747@steffann.nl> <CAO42Z2yLii6YU+niFoEwX=xJrrAQ0Roc7xtEDpE9oF=MMJng=w@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr38f0MU6F=qab9tP-0xCLq+36jhoRepeaHL64aOcMRDJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAKD1Yr38f0MU6F=qab9tP-0xCLq+36jhoRepeaHL64aOcMRDJw@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-To: ek@loon.co
From: Erik Kline <ek@loon.co>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 08:17:56 +0100
Message-ID: <CAAedzxqXU3Qr2Ja2sQ8dg3hKqeXRyL69b+yW6J6keaQYxxXqeg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: draft-gont-6man-slaac-renum-01
To: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, Sander Steffann <sander@steffann.nl>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/FKcm7PsITUhTO2LJki6d_uTltiw>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 07:18:11 -0000

Rolling up replies.

I think all these concerns are addressable.

Yes, this kind of loopback testing might not currently be doable on
some operating systems without more control levers.  But the kernel
could easily arrange to permit and inspect loopback'd packets before
discarding them because the source address matched a local address.

And to Bob's point: I think it's correct to say that the policy
applied to the result of a "does this work" test is in fact a policy,
and is something that probably ought to be configurable.  But that
doesn't the negate the value of learning that the prefix has become
unusable (at a minimum it would be an administratively log-worthy
event, so someone can come along later and diagnose).