IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: New Version Notification for draft-hui-6man-rpl-option-00.txt

Samita Chakrabarti <samitac2@gmail.com> Wed, 09 June 2010 16:29 UTC

Return-Path: <samitac2@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A07723A69AE for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:29:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kAslpXAfGsQo for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-vw0-f44.google.com (mail-vw0-f44.google.com [209.85.212.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7690E3A69A6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:29:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by vws9 with SMTP id 9so1729951vws.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=N6ABf2XichY1rzo4WUiDJKlIEKxLuLfzvT3VXTOICb4=; b=xCnuZHldTpTBzklK3aZm/AudY+FsqmX4/42HXUBlIRMmGtDecS6f/K1RMXET7Q/vlF RS5GaJVdBrfVoMOQJQybmvdWaLl9AlKkFcETT7lCWXBIdVAJIKPL5BDdfDjizRXeb2YC X063keFhaksYWSia0jerOjI7I2799jUGftZ1k=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=rWzsaiEEaFC8BNaP/xlD/ZpnXcjKNDYy5YFe+ZC4NEHvWLaLvpbpgbOKKDZ1fmhJWR ah0SReFJyQNruTkvizek3J0N9jk+ICdTg0my36iOKAhoA6CA05GqRO48aMUFMkuljNUd c1bvbZca2QWJWydpPkFkRpsgz90idQiUA155E=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.224.69.136 with SMTP id z8mr851231qai.233.1276100950229; Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:29:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.229.251.13 with HTTP; Wed, 9 Jun 2010 09:29:08 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ADFD1D34-0FC1-41A0-AE9C-7C6FFF6419B4@cisco.com>
References: <5193DD89-79F3-4AB4-A866-81DD9DF3A37B@archrock.com> <ADFD1D34-0FC1-41A0-AE9C-7C6FFF6419B4@cisco.com>
Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 09:29:08 -0700
Message-ID: <AANLkTimlmmux33CiqnEURnU8Td8MeU8YVjLCHxOZN5M4@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-hui-6man-rpl-option-00.txt
From: Samita Chakrabarti <samitac2@gmail.com>
To: JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com>, Jonathan Hui <jhui@archrock.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:29:13 -0000

Hi JP and Jonathan,

I support this draft for RPL usage.

One comment: it might be useful to restrict "cmpr" to a 'multiple of
8'  in order to have better byte alignment  easy handling of the code.
Is there any case, where the elided prefix may not be in multiple of 8
 in RPL ?

Thanks,
-Samita

On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 6:18 AM, JP Vasseur <jpv@cisco.com> wrote:
> Dear all,
> This is to re-activate our discussion during the last IETF meetings.
> Feed-back are very welcome since we would like to move forward as soon as
> possible, this proposed extension is indeed critical for RPL to move
> forward.
> Many Thanks.
> JP and Jonathan.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
> From: Jonathan Hui <jhui@archrock.com>
> Date: March 12, 2010 6:39:40 PM CEST
> To: ipv6@ietf.org
> Cc: "JP Vasseur (jvasseur)" <jvasseur@cisco.com>
> Subject: New Version Notification for draft-hui-6man-rpl-option-00.txt
>
> Hi,
>
> We are working on a new routing protocol (called RPL) within the ROLL WG
> targeted at low-power and lossy networks (LLNs).  Designed to operate within
> resource constraints typical to LLNs, RPL uses a slow proactive process to
> construct and maintain a routing topology but a reactive and dynamic
> approach to resolving routing inconsistencies.  In short, RPL is designed to
> utilize routing information placed within data-plane datagrams to detect
> routing inconsistencies.  To carry RPL routing information within a RPL
> routing domain, we would like to define a new IPv6 Option to be carried
> within the IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Option header.
>
> Any comments are appreciated.
>
>
> Filename: draft-hui-6man-rpl-option
> Revision: 00
> Title: RPL Option for Carrying RPL Information in Data-Plane Datagrams
> Creation_date: 2010-03-01
> WG ID: Independent Submission
> Number_of_pages: 6
>
> Abstract:
> The RPL protocol requires data-plane datagrams to carry RPL routing
> information that is processed by RPL routers when forwarding those
> datagrams. This document describes the RPL option for use within a RPL
> domain.
>
> --
> Jonathan Hui
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email