IETF Logo Mail Archive

答复: software for Mobile IPv6

Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com> Wed, 16 November 2016 05:00 UTC

Return-Path: <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A7D2129538 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:00:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.717
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.717 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-1.497, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsCpv4ZoczDh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:00:56 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lhrrgout.huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 867711294F7 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Nov 2016 21:00:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from 172.18.7.190 (EHLO lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com) ([172.18.7.190]) by lhrrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.3.7-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id CVG16704; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:00:52 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML414-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.75) by lhreml701-cah.china.huawei.com (10.201.5.93) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.235.1; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:00:51 +0000
Received: from NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com ([fe80::a54a:89d2:c471:ff]) by nkgeml414-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.75]) with mapi id 14.03.0235.001; Wed, 16 Nov 2016 13:00:46 +0800
From: Xuxiaohu <xuxiaohu@huawei.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Subject: 答复: software for Mobile IPv6
Thread-Topic: software for Mobile IPv6
Thread-Index: AQHSPucGLrOoB+CwWEy9tKbKMfIIOaDaeiWAgACULPU=
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:00:45 +0000
Message-ID: <1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE2BB36025@NKGEML515-MBX.china.huawei.com>
References: <cdce667a-a50a-bd7b-4785-8e02c64dcd42@gmail.com>, <329FF42F-CD3A-4DED-B3EE-8F8EB1556910@jisc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <329FF42F-CD3A-4DED-B3EE-8F8EB1556910@jisc.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.47.124.125]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_1FEE3F8F5CCDE64C9A8E8F4AD27C19EE2BB36025NKGEML515MBXchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
X-Mirapoint-Virus-RAPID-Raw: score=unknown(0), refid=str=0001.0A0B0205.582BE805.0023, ss=1, re=0.000, recu=0.000, reip=0.000, cl=1, cld=1, fgs=0, ip=0.0.0.0, so=2013-06-18 04:22:30, dmn=2013-03-21 17:37:32
X-Mirapoint-Loop-Id: dcdf9ae7901c022693b8357752718735
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/H0YUd3vuYyFGk4LWOEai-bJk1q0>
Cc: IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2016 05:00:58 -0000


________________________________
发件人: ipv6 [ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] 代表 Tim Chown [Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk]
发送时间: 2016年11月16日 12:08
收件人: Alexandre Petrescu
抄送: IPv6
主题: Re: software for Mobile IPv6

Hi,

On 15 Nov 2016, at 02:21, Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com<mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote:

De-emphasizing the use of Host-based mobility?  (protocol Mobile IPv6)

There is an open-source package for Mobile IPv6 at umip.org<http://umip.org>.  The linux mainline kernel has options for MIP6.  We also maintain an internal package implementing Mobile IPv6.  Also Cisco IOS has it but its HA is buggy.

I discussed this with Tim Winters today (as co-author). Our current view is to add words to the effect that host-based MIPv6 is not widely implemented or deployed, and thus that  support is not required unless the functionality is explicitly required.  I remember doing trials with MIPL and the Cisco HA maybe 7-8 years ago, which revealed a number of issues.

It seems there is more interest in network mobility?

[Xiaohu] Did you mean network-based mobility by "network mobility"? If so, yes, I think it's the current situation.

Tim

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email