Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt
Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 09 May 2019 14:07 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD3D812004C for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 07:07:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.633
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.633 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EJW3AFv95s9I for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 May 2019 07:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr (sainfoin-smtp-out.extra.cea.fr [132.167.192.228]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA2E4120077 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 May 2019 07:07:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by sainfoin-sys.extra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x49E7UfU036805; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:07:30 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id AFD4D203ED9; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr (muguet2-smtp-out.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.13]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04F8203ED7; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:07:30 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.8.35.150] (is154594.intra.cea.fr [10.8.35.150]) by muguet2-sys.intra.cea.fr (8.14.7/8.14.7/CEAnet-Internet-out-4.0) with ESMTP id x49E7UY2006433; Thu, 9 May 2019 16:07:30 +0200
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt
To: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 <ipv6@ietf.org>
References: <155721765664.29439.5319050830659075854.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <a8b10b95-d06a-827b-b3b9-72e7dca0ec69@gmail.com> <CABNhwV0Gexct===O6iyuLi3Xi=3AA-HDjkwiC5_h=_DjaJ0XDg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Alexandre Petrescu <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <f5c51387-c7da-fcc9-a9b4-dbbce4483b28@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 16:07:30 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CABNhwV0Gexct===O6iyuLi3Xi=3AA-HDjkwiC5_h=_DjaJ0XDg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: fr
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/HmXJ1ame5BHboN7oq1g8zyG5j1k>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 May 2019 14:07:38 -0000
Le 08/05/2019 à 06:21, Gyan Mishra a écrit : > Hi Alex > > I did a test in the lab for that one use case of making the default link > local EUI64 more intuitive in the lab and Id id a worst case scenario > test populating all the 16 bit nibbles and all hex digits within each > nibble so no :: 0's compression on a Cisco IOS XE router running 16.x > code and confirmed the OSPF neighbor still comes up even though the > entire 54 bit all 0's field per the RFC is populated in effect violating > the current RFC but because its like-like intra-vendor the OSPF > adjacency forms. > > So I have tested this concept and it works across all Cisco platforms > IOS, XE, XR, NXOS that you can populate the entire 54 bit all 0's field. > > So the big caveat with this and justification for this draft is "mix > vendor" environment inter-operability" which is one of the reasons for > the IETF and to have RFC's and standards that allows any device from any > vendor to communicate that supports the RFC. I think that is a MAJOR > point to add to the justification behind the RFC in the use cases where > on a managed IPv6 network that the administrator can now hardcode the > IPv6 address fully populating entire 54 bit subnet-id & station-id and > routing protocols will now work and OSPF, ISIS, EIGRP adjacency can now > work in a mix vendor environment. So I make a section called 'Justification'. > R1 > ipv6 addr fe80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111 link-local > > R2 > ipv6 addr fe80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:2222 link-local > > R1#sh ipv6 ospf nei > > OSPFv3 Router with ID (1.1.1.1) (Process ID 6000) > > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Interface ID Interface > 2.2.2.2 1 FULL/DR 00:00:35 18 > GigabitEthernet1/0/2 Thanks for illustrating what you mean. Maybe a Neighbor ID of the form fe80:2::2 could help OSPF IPv6. Alex > > R1#sh ipv6 ospf int g1/0/2 > GigabitEthernet1/0/2 is up, line protocol is up > Link Local Address FE80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111, Interface > ID 18 > Area 2.2.2.2, Process ID 6000, Instance ID 0, Router ID 1.1.1.1 > Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 1 > SHA-1 authentication SPI 666661, secure socket UP (errors: 0) > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State BDR, Priority 1 > Designated Router (ID) 2.2.2.2, local address > FE80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:2222 > Backup Designated router (ID) 1.1.1.1, local address > FE80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 > Hello due in 00:00:03 > Graceful restart helper support enabled > Index 1/5/14, flood queue length 0 > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)/0x0(0) > Last flood scan length is 2, maximum is 9 > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 1 msec > Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 > Adjacent with neighbor 2.2.2.2 (Designated Router) > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) > > R2#sh ipv6 ospf nei > > OSPFv3 Router with ID (2.2.2.2) (Process ID 6000) > > Neighbor ID Pri State Dead Time Interface ID Interface > 1.1.1.1 1 FULL/BDR 00:00:37 18 > GigabitEthernet1/0/2 > > R2#sh ipv6 ospf int g1/0/2 > GigabitEthernet1/0/2 is up, line protocol is up > Link Local Address FE80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:2222, Interface > ID 18 > Area 2.2.2.2, Process ID 6000, Instance ID 0, Router ID 104.255.32.2 > Network Type BROADCAST, Cost: 1 > SHA-1 authentication SPI 666661, secure socket UP (errors: 0) > Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State DR, Priority 1 > Designated Router (ID) 2.2.2.2, local address > FE80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:2222 > Backup Designated router (ID) 1.1.1.1, local address > FE80:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111:1111 > Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5 > Hello due in 00:00:05 > Graceful restart helper support enabled > Index 1/5/14, flood queue length 0 > Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)/0x0(0) > Last flood scan length is 0, maximum is 7 > Last flood scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 1 msec > Neighbor Count is 1, Adjacent neighbor count is 1 > Adjacent with neighbor 1.1.1.1 (Backup Designated Router) > Suppress hello for 0 neighbor(s) > > > > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 4:32 AM Alexandre Petrescu > <alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@gmail.com>> wrote: > > Hi 6MANners, > > I submitted the version 17 of this draft about variable plen for LLs. > > This is the ChangeLog: > > -17: added a new use-case for sysadmins in need of an intuitive LL > address (to check with ping) used for next-hop of routing > protocols. > > -16: added a description of the behaviour of ifconfig > fe80:1::1/32 on MAC OS and Windows 10 Operating Systems; > > added a suggestion about the use of ULA prefixes instead of LL > prefixes; > > added a reference to an RFC 7404 about the use of > only LL addresses in an IPv6 network; > > explained the result from practice of the use of 'fe80::1:2/64'; > > explained why the text says 'hidden' for '%' on some OSs; > mentioned the DNS kind of solutions; > > added explanation of manual configuration and automation; > > added exaplanation of an example of complex to remember and type > link-local addresses; > > added explanation of why DNS solution is a problem mouvement, not > problem resolution. > > Alex > > -------- Message transféré -------- > Sujet : New Version Notification for > draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt > Date : Tue, 7 May 2019 01:27:36 -0700 > De : internet-drafts@ietf.org <mailto:internet-drafts@ietf.org> > Pour : Naveen Kottapalli <naveen.sarma@gmail.com > <mailto:naveen.sarma@gmail.com>>, Loganaden Velvindron > <loganaden@gmail.com <mailto:loganaden@gmail.com>>, Alexandre > Petrescu <Alexandre.Petrescu@cea.fr > <mailto:Alexandre.Petrescu@cea.fr>>, > Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com <mailto:hayabusagsm@gmail.com>>, > Alexandre Petrescu > <alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr <mailto:alexandre.petrescu@cea.fr>> > > > A new version of I-D, draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt > has been successfully submitted by Alexandre Petrescu and posted to the > IETF repository. > > Name: draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len > Revision: 17 > Title: The length of the prefix of an IPv6 link-local > address ranges > from 10 to 127 > Document date: 2019-05-06 > Group: Individual Submission > Pages: 14 > URL: > https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17.txt > Status: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len/ > Htmlized: > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17 > Htmlized: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len > Diff: > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-petrescu-6man-ll-prefix-len-17 > > Abstract: > A rejected Erratum to RFC4291 "IPv6 Addr Archi" on the topic of > link- > local addresses 'would need' a draft. This draft is an answer to > that need. > > The length of the prefix of an IPv6 link-local address is variable. > The minimal value is 10 decimal. The maximum value is 127 decimal. > > > > > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of > submission > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org > <http://tools.ietf.org>. > > The IETF Secretariat > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org> > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > -- > Gyan S. Mishra > IT Network Engineering & Technology Consultant > Routing & Switching / Service Provider MPLS & IPv6 Expert > www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT > <http://www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT> > Mobile – 202-734-1000 >
- Fwd: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Nick Hilliard
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… sthaug
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… tom petch
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Ole Troan
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Alexandre Petrescu
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… sthaug
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Mark Smith
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… sthaug
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… tom petch
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… Gyan Mishra
- Re: New Version Notification for draft-petrescu-6… tom petch