comments on ipv6-over-mstp
Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 22:04 UTC
Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85CC811E8136 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7O2GAAh1kgCU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gx0-f172.google.com (mail-gx0-f172.google.com [209.85.161.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90A4211E812D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gxk19 with SMTP id 19so764411gxk.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=QwzzuMzmfetWWlzfrwSWvCjnyphMpIAtoAe0hEjrRy0=; b=UVRNVYF+w0bUMt0IJJFrXPOG33R/Su17dJqnS9LBbZLI6QD9BRLEIODjql+KWE0ii2 Vyh1OR2mxFGI3/xhWXsYnMvU6VskFVLk7bK+ux7S3TvvAs1vR1zgD5q3QALvstPJHlld OILyIBf6JOgRVcWc+iNx6cW9eJqgFC3cCn1ck=
Received: by 10.142.248.30 with SMTP id v30mr4247251wfh.27.1311717842858; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (dhcp-150a.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.21.10]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t20sm565460wfe.12.2011.07.26.15.04.01 (version=SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:04:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4E2F39CF.20005@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:03:59 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; fr; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: comments on ipv6-over-mstp
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:04:04 -0000
Comments on draft draft-lynn-6man-6lobac-00: - needs a section on multicast address mapping; it may not be straightforward: it may need to _not_ send all ip-multicasted messages to 255 link-layer address: the solicited-node multicast address includes the octet address (as opposed to eg ethernet 6octets) hence it could send it to that octet address (not 255). - 1 Poll for Master - sounds as RS, why not mapping one into another? 2 Reply to Poll for Master sounds as RA, same. - MLD mapping could be as well useful. Alex
- comments on ipv6-over-mstp Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: comments on ipv6-over-mstp Kerry Lynn