Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions)
Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Tue, 26 July 2011 22:05 UTC
Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21A1E11E812D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:05:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_12=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9w3mhrxDWoCM for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:05:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96A2411E80A2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:05:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [IPv6:2001:df8::80:129a:ddff:feb1:e750] ([IPv6:2001:df8:0:80:129a:ddff:feb1:e750]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p6QM5RgA048906 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:28 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Subject: Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Joel Jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E2F2D3C.5070200@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 18:05:26 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <FB11CBF3-C802-4058-B591-0DD23E908224@bogus.com>
References: <4E2F2D3C.5070200@gmail.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]); Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:28 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 22:05:37 -0000
If you're commenting on v6nd draft I don't think we have any intention of connecting ~1.8 * 10^19 hosts to a subnet... On Jul 26, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Alexandru Petrescu wrote: > 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) and only for anglo-saxons. > > 2^64 is exabytes of memory (not giga, nor tera, nor peta). > > I am not sure you look at adapting nd for these figures. > > Alex > -------------------------------------------------------------------- > IETF IPv6 working group mailing list > ipv6@ietf.org > Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 > -------------------------------------------------------------------- >
- 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) Joel Jaeggli
- Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: 2^64 is 10s of trillions (not just trillions) Joel Jaeggli