Lack of responses on WG Last Calls
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Thu, 16 December 2010 13:51 UTC
Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 80DFF3A7042 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:51:23 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q9If-vKOU0Qh for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C531E3A6DA1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:51:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B6DB881C5 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:53:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.local (c-76-100-105-215.hsd1.md.comcast.net [76.100.105.215]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6382B13682E4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Dec 2010 05:53:06 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D0A19C0.4020409@innovationslab.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 08:53:04 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101207 Thunderbird/3.1.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: IPv6 WG Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2010 13:51:23 -0000
All,
Working group last calls ended 10 days ago for the two RPL-related
drafts (draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option and
draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header). By my count, each draft received
*1* comment. The chairs cannot and will not advance a draft to the IESG
with so little feedback. We request that WG participants review these
drafts and provide their feedback on them.
Regards,
Brian & Bob
- Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Brian Haberman
- RE: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Don Sturek
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Fred Baker
- RE: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Don Sturek
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Fred Baker
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Thomas Narten
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Fred Baker
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Thomas Narten
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Bob Hinden
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Bob Hinden
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Don Sturek
- RE: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls Don Sturek
- Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls JP Vasseur