Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Fri, 17 December 2010 16:42 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CCC03A6921 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:42:00 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.225
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.225 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.374, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dIZNIrGZThhD for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pw0-f44.google.com (mail-pw0-f44.google.com [209.85.160.44]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8AC2D3A68F1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by pwi7 with SMTP id 7so178685pwi.31 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:43:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:subject:mime-version :content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=fIDZSdtEBBF9CX3DYT4OCaJFJ11ufh/dFfXZZAXWS3A=; b=MqdVytWf7RmsfdFtmUX2Aq7CLs/CIZHSeQF9kAX+h4inw+d47WQs72+Py++/90ARxz q6OWIMMvdxHizkR+5orhb4Gt8njXZT247fEwWjIjGFyuwnkKfXDlei1XHx5S9WsWVxh4 dDzo20feAwE3SvDMuhqpnoaCNTTb46JtsOiQQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=UEpmzhIeteMrkQZtY2nWtQUJGTfz8wNOGXfQwWE0DFimPA30CWXJkxajGz6RIl4tFg GQyp5DJ9JdCnpp9fTYG1bsPpn24Vijzs/TMjTOmxmKKduBDv6QJ6sCyFQ+tWzUfMgB07 +Wk63yQ0ufa/NQ+i1QndEzex++zlJHlpUCVKI=
Received: by 10.142.158.19 with SMTP id g19mr803797wfe.387.1292604226825; Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:43:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [10.0.0.37] (c-67-188-5-28.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [67.188.5.28]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id x35sm617744wfd.13.2010.12.17.08.43.44 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:43:45 -0800 (PST)
Subject: Re: Lack of responses on WG Last Calls
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <51DDC1AB-6FB7-42A0-AC48-D8B883B871D4@cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 08:43:43 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B4634440-6D92-4ACB-BF6D-A75462EC8A84@gmail.com>
References: <4D0A19C0.4020409@innovationslab.net> <005701cb9d2d$556395b0$002ac110$@sturek@att.net> <5A0C0340-98D7-4ED1-8CD8-335D610EC9B2@cisco.com> <201012171241.oBHCfh5e003040@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <51DDC1AB-6FB7-42A0-AC48-D8B883B871D4@cisco.com>
To: Fred Baker <fred@cisco.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082)
Cc: Thomas Narten <narten@us.ibm.com>, 'IPv6 WG Mailing List' <ipv6@ietf.org>, 'Brian Haberman' <brian@innovationslab.net>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:42:00 -0000

Fred,

> The fact is that the working group is trying to decide n something and Zigbee has relevant data. I'm simply asking for an appropriately-redacted version of the report to be made public.

Sharing implementation experience is always good thing to assist a w.g. to make a decision on advancing a document.  I look forward to it.

While we may not have kings in the IETF, a bit more running code would be a good thing!

Thanks,
Bob