IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] Review feedback requested: draft-ietf-pim-rfc1112bis

Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca> Tue, 05 March 2024 21:15 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 711FCC14F5F7 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:15:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=sandelman.ca
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O3F5vpryEceh for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:15:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca (tuna.sandelman.ca [209.87.249.19]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59022C14F69F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 13:15:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78C8938993; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:15:42 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tuna.sandelman.ca ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id cfnLmB3_ntHb; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:15:41 -0500 (EST)
Received: from sandelman.ca (obiwan.sandelman.ca [IPv6:2607:f0b0:f:2::247]) by tuna.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5594038991; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:15:41 -0500 (EST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sandelman.ca; s=mail; t=1709673341; bh=/DcDgpzumjqqnfvB7aELfjv424CG5GT5zukFV/xh2+A=; h=From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=pN8lt5BXqWyQgb5o7ed6pdFWRL0SiPdKKn8X0TKIizCzSmJUNvHGChSNXDtFQLz+3 3Ca5FaLBOnntZuf9vavMj8cLxvhoAVCV9aDfnYxAuXM2RH7EgDreUEq4fs2YZ3G+6n miQsqauMD6yD8N/v6Z10d1MHsxb6Ab000LLfDWoev7fXt2ErxR+VGtVRNDI/Wi3Mee vGGfdgCWxj7PEm6v2BWhn1EYYypNtv9eGKSRzKLdumQv30OEN1WJvDIysHpBuKt7Cd ggqTqHc9UPjcLlSodDM+5FUe3CGgiJYLCANILBuDIQBI9AhfcCLWBCsXJxZbNqruaC h91YLh8Ong4VQ==
Received: from obiwan.sandelman.ca (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51682735; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:15:41 -0500 (EST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
cc: ipv6@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <ZeZNkgtrVqbe09wv@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <ZeZNkgtrVqbe09wv@faui48e.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.8+dev; GNU Emacs 28.2
X-Face: $\n1pF)h^`}$H>Hk{L"x@)JS7<%Az}5RyS@k9X%29-lHB$Ti.V>2bi.~ehC0; <'$9xN5Ub# z!G,p`nR&p7Fz@^UXIn156S8.~^@MJ*mMsD7=QFeq%AL4m<nPbLgmtKK-5dC@#:k
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg="pgp-sha512"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 16:15:41 -0500
Message-ID: <3680.1709673341@obiwan.sandelman.ca>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/Ky_o0Alw20EwMgnBmig45Lp4aJY>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] Review feedback requested: draft-ietf-pim-rfc1112bis
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2024 21:15:48 -0000

May I suggest that you first do draft-ietf-pim-rfc1112-00,
which would be just your updating of 1112 into kramdown/XML.

Then we can see which edits are just modernization of tools,
and where the actual, substantive, meat is?

Appendix I goes away, and then we also have Appendix B (to-be-removed)
Appendix I has a diagram, so maybe it's important?

--
Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF@sandelman.ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT consulting )
           Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email