Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage
Randy Bush <randy@psg.com> Wed, 30 May 2012 09:50 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@psg.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 019EC21F86B4 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:50:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.497
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.497 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.102, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5356g5B8BWLv for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ran.psg.com (ran.psg.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A62A621F86C1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 30 May 2012 02:50:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=rair.psg.com.psg.com) by ran.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.77 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from <randy@psg.com>) id 1SZfY5-000Dvp-1E; Wed, 30 May 2012 09:50:37 +0000
Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 18:50:35 +0900
Message-ID: <m2likaq9p0.wl%randy@psg.com>
From: Randy Bush <randy@psg.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage
In-Reply-To: <4FC5C64C.5040809@gmail.com>
References: <B0147C3DD45E42478038FC347CCB65FE02BC2B4E19@XCH-MW-08V.mw.nos.boeing.com> <m2pq9msdva.wl%randy@psg.com> <20120530011807.C1552210E0FD@drugs.dv.isc.org> <4FC5C64C.5040809@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.15.9 (Almost Unreal) Emacs/22.3 Mule/5.0 (SAKAKI)
MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.6 - "Maruoka")
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Cc: ipv6 deployment prevention <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 30 May 2012 09:50:39 -0000
> Obviously. An erratum that attempts to reverse a clear WG consensus > that the person doesn't like is a misuse of the errata system. that is not exactly what occurred. and blame is not very interesting anyway. i have asked the rfced if they can do a derattum. others migh support this if it is questioned. randy
- RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage Manfredi, Albert E
- Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage Randy Bush
- Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage Seiichi Kawamura
- Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage Mark Andrews
- Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage Brian E Carpenter
- Re: RFC 5952, the errata, and real-world usage Randy Bush