Re: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man
Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net> Fri, 11 March 2011 16:16 UTC
Return-Path: <brian@innovationslab.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C7FD3A6AC7 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:16:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.449
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.449 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.150, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Cf9BhVArqiKp for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uillean.fuaim.com (uillean.fuaim.com [206.197.161.140]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 763863A6A98 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:16:41 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clairseach.fuaim.com (clairseach.fuaim.com [206.197.161.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by uillean.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3055B88289 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:17:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clemson.jhuapl.edu (unknown [128.244.243.28]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clairseach.fuaim.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7306130002 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:17:56 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <4D7A4B2E.3090206@innovationslab.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 11:17:50 -0500
From: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.5; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man
References: <016c01cbe005$cf8c0730$6ea41590$@sturek@att.net>
In-Reply-To: <016c01cbe005$cf8c0730$6ea41590$@sturek@att.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:16:42 -0000
On 3/11/11 11:03 AM, Don Sturek wrote: > Can I ask about the current WG status of the following drafts: > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header/ > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option/ > The WG Last Call completed for these documents. There were some comments that, according to the authors, have been resolved but not incorporated into the document(s). > > > Also, the following draft has not been adopted by WG (can it?): > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hui-6man-trickle-mcast/ > No one has made a request for the WG to adopt it. > > We would also like to see the trickle multicast draft adopted by the group. > >From my brief read of the draft, I am not sure it belongs in 6MAN. It describes a multicast forwarding paradigm specific to low-power networks. It would seem like ROLL is a better fit for this draft. Regards, Brian
- Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man Don Sturek
- Re: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man Brian Haberman