Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man

"Don Sturek" <d.sturek@att.net> Fri, 11 March 2011 16:01 UTC

Return-Path: <d.sturek@att.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E28F43A69F7 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:01:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0.451
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.451 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MSGID_MULTIPLE_AT=1.449, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id m7REvxUApgr9 for <ipv6@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com (nm15-vm0.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com [98.138.91.70]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 2921C3A69D6 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:01:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm15.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Mar 2011 16:03:08 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.174] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Mar 2011 16:03:08 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1030.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 11 Mar 2011 16:03:08 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 805338.32881.bm@omp1030.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 87487 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 16:03:08 -0000
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=att.net; s=s1024; t=1299859388; bh=b6OpjaVa+9c2EonM6WO+nLS4JkumRRWYOxbNoLnFHeg=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Reply-To:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=wtKjkn42xA545p3PY0qySAvogtRDcSz4u6k6TmNLE8jU6SKs+1ko4zK9L+iT0H0OvXoV4poNImjYGJhmAQ/tPS5Hq4XNhUl6lLFtABbAia/JtK3ZxHb9M9+KkFALbQDLpm1pEqWVvdxlxMpgSnWmqNkzy+X4ddu6x6dJY8GtEyQ=
Received: from Studio (d.sturek@69.105.138.3 with login) by smtp101.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 11 Mar 2011 08:03:08 -0800 PST
X-Yahoo-SMTP: fvjol_aswBAraSJvMLe2r1XTzhBhbFxY8q8c3jo-
X-YMail-OSG: C25BEIQVM1npUh28UP.cHv5CcrpzV5phzGrGI.fZGaXxQVN 5YBQg0.EWIN1N.oBhfP32TlV2YqfHoexgrtrZM5mAQ6vt5EGlZupXqOdl6PY kF4VWbd.Mer3vwh3pr5b9NUNZgP5P7EBGmQK2R_1vw0_SK_3sioCkqBpH9TZ CWLQwqlr0FtMHP9To8vw4ScYyE4VIByzq2T4iAXC4yE17eYY_9WG4rv8hFf0 61t3mDVDaP7fz__bu6q2cqPBMJJugKpFOAuEkQ34fuvI9cZ5CuDHwMwk036. I4IftAxBl3B1jEx5QSIY2gXKiOlM-
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
From: Don Sturek <d.sturek@att.net>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Status of ROLL RPL related drafts in 6man
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 08:03:05 -0800
Message-ID: <016c01cbe005$cf8c0730$6ea41590$@sturek>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_016D_01CBDFC2.C168C730"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AcvgBXZ8O6PAm0AwTEW4KQOKhlAfYg==
Content-Language: en-us
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: d.sturek@att.net
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 16:01:59 -0000

Can I ask about the current WG status of the following drafts:

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rpl-routing-header/

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-rpl-option/

 

Also, the following draft has not been adopted by WG (can it?):

http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-hui-6man-trickle-mcast/

 

Before the holidays, there was a thread around lack of responses on last
call for the first two drafts.  Did Last Call ever complete (does not appear
so from the WG page)

 

We would also like to see the trickle multicast draft adopted by the group.

 

I am affiliated with the ZigBee Alliance working on the Smart Energy 2
project.  We plan to deploy with these drafts next year with a very large
(many million devices) deployment.  We would like to see these drafts moved
along in the process.  We have been doing interoperability testing (with 10
vendors) for the past several months with these drafts so have data to share
on our experience.

 

Thanks,

 

Don Sturek

Chair, ZigBee Core Stack Working Group (responsible for "ZigBee IP"
application profile targeting Smart Energy 2)