IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on draft-li-6man-enhanced-extension-header Sec 2.1

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Fri, 12 July 2019 03:40 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12AF412001E for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.697
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.697 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AC_DIV_BONANZA=0.001, BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TO_NAjHYp0Rk for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (pb-smtp21.pobox.com [173.228.157.53]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 508D0120019 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp21.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 307E76E42C for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:40:44 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=sasl; bh=Popz12oEAhmBCBTzJB3Ca0wbWQQ=; b=Y63LSa TmLv68pPRZV/wiJTMYxuZAKE6co4zu9rSJ8zeTvJtnfuIgFxY+YTfV0Ouoi7saIg x2XDd90fu2B+96W17QjdBOd9WzIoihlj/9bmHtCpysRIN9Om6/kJN1IV61GIo9BD 0pL7+auUfmPids8DWsYk6uW9jS9FcJbuKemuI=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=efmezKRZ64awwJyMH8RKmWm+MnO3SZW4 lxZ7wUtYOjBcXah/ALQYoH3ClZ/TK9/Tz4rAPVXz8VyacLoOZ88h2vRrwgTVuLT5 L9e1bxzsA9a5wbrchREKbcTPPhgzjfms18fqvu+cZlQU20TEhmp8+CxApZ9QSt43 SEGKfk3nYWg=
Received: from pb-smtp21.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 306266E421 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:40:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: from mail-io1-f52.google.com (unknown [209.85.166.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp21.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B76B16E41F for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 23:40:39 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from heard@pobox.com)
Received: by mail-io1-f52.google.com with SMTP id o9so17443249iom.3 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUm257uZZvnzXKi0/0pjF3//DwzyqoA+igl1EpczwXgNrrHZM1G I71UpE9zIaYDbgfOyGz+SQnpw4lK0EcpwlNKDD4=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwBL6vRx0IWTTVw+OFLy5IhYwCJm5YqH/CS0bQ0nQuOCBuSXXge/cW6blEvgMOjgMWwzyGjSFZ/2CI3o9mwayg=
X-Received: by 2002:a5e:d51a:: with SMTP id e26mr1106797iom.71.1562902838635; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACL_3VGP4-kmyJGo1Gxea7HhcKY3P3EGHwgmcYxCGLnjPh-YCg@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE148446F8@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wJR_fssOwLnz_1s=Cz-L3azvXE3tWSB+4YHT9q-QEv8Q@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE148447E9@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CACL_3VF3L89uRuCQY_GO6HJm=r0JVWBvZzma-RNmM3s7rqy3pQ@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE14846974@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE14846974@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:40:27 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VFaP6=+wMiAZrGqv8SkwYeyjyV3d=fgHPX-hQdXVYoUUw@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VFaP6=+wMiAZrGqv8SkwYeyjyV3d=fgHPX-hQdXVYoUUw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-li-6man-enhanced-extension-header Sec 2.1
To: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>
Cc: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith@gmail.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, Lizhenbin <lizhenbin@huawei.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000083f757058d73ac2a"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: D154D64A-A456-11E9-A14E-8D86F504CC47-06080547!pb-smtp21.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/P-TtFnA-rm66UH19bF-VhskbXxE>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2019 03:40:48 -0000

On Thu, Jul 11, 2019 at 7:19 PM Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) <
pengshuping@huawei.com> wrote:

> We could do engineering at each option to indicate every router how to
> treat it. However, that will not be very efficient since each option type
> needs to be gone through and checked against the preset configuration.
>

The new header that you propose uses the same options, so how would it be
different?

Mike Heard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email