IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Comments on draft-li-6man-enhanced-extension-header Sec 2.1

"C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com> Mon, 15 July 2019 04:22 UTC

Return-Path: <heard@pobox.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F1D5812006D for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 21:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.699
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.699 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=pobox.com; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=heard@pobox.com header.d=pobox.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cxl40E9X3WuF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 21:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (pb-smtp2.pobox.com [64.147.108.71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 14F42120020 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 21:22:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pb-smtp2.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 305C71594B2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:22:16 -0400 (EDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gV3A9Jhy4CyponqBAfg5nwcMmrA=; b=Et4+XM qx6KhQR3rBDlE6418X+K0FIIaLyaCaws17xf5f61vEe3rFr/bBDrq1ZlDQa74+JL OpLIZwx5YvVDcTB/cXNsZTsbydx/lFsfMaSk+1pcbC9AbTU8ez1qyCCgYasZzOfW CxkAf+GqZ9qNHVfc9WfyPqicnAOlQ3WDkSOsc=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=cmTTSVJ9xbQvvNN0TE6UMDw3d6eCgxbK pSGAsibjg4y4nrFjSkYj6p52sZ9BEN2K40dZ167xs77Cs9ldTh3odNiwAGn/GDJ7 spvDQ8qpogWcV4G1kKebczdEKmSZ35pauUcA7E4n5CJm/w97bCdlV32e+HJtRJBm QeeCS2ox8sw=
Received: from pb-smtp2.nyi.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19D661594B1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:22:16 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mail-io1-f50.google.com (unknown [209.85.166.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp2.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9643A1594AE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2019 00:22:15 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by mail-io1-f50.google.com with SMTP id k8so32075924iot.1 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 21:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUBGCqW6Df5RQ8OE6yGg7IGj5YC7J2Aj7xtjvbZ5V9axE//yNOl eZYBAPwQf6AHRTjBSW1A369F51HahM/0uR1AzyM=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqySykqnl9RpJb/cyJFxRTrreoUiY5iQPa1lNx7tE6NvXe7nKXD7j3j0sYJO5mOMBQk14O6wCREUgWaQJoZH8XQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:8b8b:: with SMTP id n133mr22103557iod.183.1563164535134; Sun, 14 Jul 2019 21:22:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CACL_3VGP4-kmyJGo1Gxea7HhcKY3P3EGHwgmcYxCGLnjPh-YCg@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE148446F8@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CAO42Z2wJR_fssOwLnz_1s=Cz-L3azvXE3tWSB+4YHT9q-QEv8Q@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE148447E9@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CACL_3VF3L89uRuCQY_GO6HJm=r0JVWBvZzma-RNmM3s7rqy3pQ@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE14846974@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CACL_3VFaP6=+wMiAZrGqv8SkwYeyjyV3d=fgHPX-hQdXVYoUUw@mail.gmail.com> <4278D47A901B3041A737953BAA078ADE1484836A@dggeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <CACL_3VH+9i4-yxYA9b46KGWgS-0ka6hvCAPpj3RRJC6CAoZ+BA@mail.gmail.com> <16400029-02ff-e63e-7897-d4ab926788c5@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <16400029-02ff-e63e-7897-d4ab926788c5@gmail.com>
From: "C. M. Heard" <heard@pobox.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2019 21:22:03 -0700
X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: <CACL_3VHDEWWPOGD3XWNWqP4vu=Q9VMwtwnqjX+1H2fEr3up+OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <CACL_3VHDEWWPOGD3XWNWqP4vu=Q9VMwtwnqjX+1H2fEr3up+OQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Comments on draft-li-6man-enhanced-extension-header Sec 2.1
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Cc: "Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)" <pengshuping@huawei.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d7a243058db09a83"
X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2038E2FC-A6B8-11E9-B4B0-72EEE64BB12D-06080547!pb-smtp2.pobox.com
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/YDB597mzCiKP3OvnxGKuXY8jy4M>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2019 04:22:19 -0000

On Sun, Jul 14, 2019 at 9:00 PM Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> Both segment routing and OAM are mentioned as use cases in
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-carpenter-limited-domains-09.
> These are typically features that will be on the fast path by
> configuration in a particular domain, and will not work properly
> outside such a domain.

Yes, operation in a limited domain is the best that can be
expected. In such a domain, there would be no need for
a new variant of the HbH Options Header.

Mike Heard

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email