IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-05.txt

otroan@employees.org Fri, 15 April 2016 08:45 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 400F512D873 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:45:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.336
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.336 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=employees.org; domainkeys=pass (1024-bit key) header.from=otroan@employees.org header.d=employees.org
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 04h_CGZSYcH5 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:45:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from incoming.kjsl.com (inbound02.kjsl.com [IPv6:2001:1868:2002::144]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E6012D6EE for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:45:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowbell.employees.org ([IPv6:2001:1868:a000:17::142]) by ironport02.kjsl.com with ESMTP; 15 Apr 2016 08:45:10 +0000
Received: from cowbell.employees.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B21DDD7882; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; s=selector1; bh=w7rJ9YTXY3wPgt9ASz+CErAGa3E=; b= puXLg8xI0Gcsz1A2sFV/g+LfwNUiUopGD51kr0Zt1LZGQs5D4RBZusyzX9fNjgme K3KkshHrpueBDOLy1lx+6o2ZiSzkQ4lP0x6W82GrPC2A/lBb6AGNkIroxltIQQ// CfiKlLPSVnKEqBzTN6eCYxrAXkwEqBIvlALJnCM2dlY=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=employees.org; h=subject :mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id :references:to; q=dns; s=selector1; b=f3+fJ2YtaBOFjLbkrAAZb+8P7d vDIMudTrL9+W5HMFNJJu+FGUh6M4c7a7Qx4JKbfEUzKt8pNAeNb5GhYQePPLzfPE o5lZiSC/Hg8MAcEkq5sr4LJAUkXk2QtiXtNzku3HP8ME9BXCetavWTIxtY2Wv8y7 xuDjko9cQN8AzdszQ=
Received: from h.hanazo.no (unknown [173.38.220.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: otroan) by cowbell.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6FD48D7884; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 01:45:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3BA14650F2; Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:45:05 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: draft-van-beijnum-multi-mtu-05.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 9.3 \(3124\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_463440F3-4891-494E-8A27-C84489731B91"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.6b2
From: otroan@employees.org
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604141512140.16013@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 10:45:05 +0200
Message-Id: <46AC6821-DB5F-4092-8C30-121D5CA3302A@employees.org>
References: <20160406151831.GZ518778@eidolon> <570569C2.4030601@acm.org> <20160406212048.GB518778@eidolon> <20160406220411.GC518778@eidolon> <E27329D1-400E-4470-8277-64A664508854@employees.org> <20160414122245.GN518778@eidolon> <alpine.DEB.2.02.1604141512140.16013@uplift.swm.pp.se>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3124)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/RL78dZhjNwD60idj2Kjq2pTshKc>
Cc: Erik Nordmark <nordmark@acm.org>, Iljitsch van Beijnum <iljitsch@muada.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2016 08:45:13 -0000

Mikael,

> This would however require that we allow MTUs tied to not only PIO, but also RIO. I still don't know what to do about the implicit default route that one points to anyone one sees an RA from. Personally I consider this design of the IPv6 protocol to be unfortunate.

When you get MTU path discovery in BGP advertisements then we'll put it in the RIO. ;-)

Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email