IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Sun, 03 April 2016 15:04 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 274CE12D564 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 08:04:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1Xio4YsMu5Kq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 08:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from na01-by2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr650122.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.65.122]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 20D3312D198 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 08:04:30 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=junipernetworks.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-juniper-net; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=WijqhzErTx2U4oAUViME0CQv/oeb/d6Oq9PGX4f+UyE=; b=BCEeiU/NPQ9Jm1h4YIDBuvTNWwn2NJi+L8lgqzKV3Q6xYvMartb3bT6+yK5sgCkFYIY+2f1UJTFdPyDPYwITDrI1/xd9KQxKW1plyLGCOstWs1osqCE0TO39p+/zGe/Ea/g0TBqGkWgrVQ6AsusLl/ybp15Hq4cTQhQCIrASuCU=
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.447.15; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:04:28 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0447.027; Sun, 3 Apr 2016 15:04:28 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: "otroan@employees.org" <otroan@employees.org>, Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01
Thread-Index: AQHRde+vpur3jempfUO2BKkuKIZdl59OFwVAgAEZMYCAA3Kj8IABlYGAgAIu8jCADjAyAIAAARjggAAKJ4CAABYqYIAADlkAgAAK2ACAABWWEIAAYJIAgACSYYCABpoQgIAK9/Ig
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:04:28 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB198528062351E9DAB79CD640AE9C0@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <88F34B62-6DB7-496F-8E7F-9E5249348B92@employees.org> <56F0A7DE.40507@gmail.com> <BLUPR05MB19858DBC71B8F774CD469505AE800@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <20160322.100604.74718563.sthaug@nethelp.no> <56F185C7.1090507@innovationslab.net> <5D8258EE-97C2-4E96-AA6C-31B8E5978EA1@employees.org>
In-Reply-To: <5D8258EE-97C2-4E96-AA6C-31B8E5978EA1@employees.org>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: employees.org; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;employees.org; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: d026bab7-4427-4c48-bc94-08d35bd1412f
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1988; 5:Beq3YRSOLduEWyBJKjdFyX61CYbIFNl6b4QCIQGcf9J6Jv7S1kOEJ5lsYxY4yO3XKAJ+y6qWsqcAj1Q7wbD8EIFVfheQD2gwjq1jrF/ZVV1YYi/44+PqITQr3srzRLeVHEEMnJi30NUNiYRB5pV6vg==; 24:SfQUxKP9/PT5RX9wpu0WEZrxayeus3SD7V14aNezVOETD6dKP/NwgpiQTCZMcCXgUkf3HUgES4uvWn56ojDdtLfJ07jayqsm4LY0jrgRRd4=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1988834278976F598DCCF1E5AE9C0@BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:;
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(3002001)(10201501046); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988;
x-forefront-prvs: 09011458FC
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(37854004)(13464003)(377454003)(2906002)(3280700002)(3660700001)(4326007)(93886004)(2501003)(11100500001)(50986999)(76176999)(54356999)(74316001)(5003600100002)(33656002)(189998001)(1220700001)(81166005)(92566002)(586003)(6116002)(102836003)(3846002)(87936001)(5001770100001)(1096002)(5004730100002)(230783001)(10400500002)(19580405001)(19580395003)(76576001)(99286002)(86362001)(77096005)(106116001)(122556002)(2950100001)(5008740100001)(2900100001)(5002640100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 03 Apr 2016 15:04:28.8530 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1988
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/RQpLplcp7U2IzIyXc0cjMGrGWUc>
Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 15:04:32 -0000

Folks,

Does anyone know of an IPv6 RSVP implementation that relies on the HBH Options Extension Header?

AFAIK, no such implementation exist for RSVP-TE (i.e., MPLS signaling). However, such an implementation might exist for RSVP's original use-case (bandwidth reservation).

If anybody know of other implementations, please chime in.

                                                                               Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: ipv6 [mailto:ipv6-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> otroan@employees.org
> Sent: Saturday, March 26, 2016 6:39 PM
> To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
> Cc: 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01
> 
>  [SNIP}
> 
> MLD, RSVP. IOS depends on the HBH (as I would expect many others).
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email