IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01

Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net> Mon, 07 March 2016 22:44 UTC

Return-Path: <rbonica@juniper.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfc.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78D0E1CD92C; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:44:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.41]) by localhost (ietfc.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SZgYaDNJapgP; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:44:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1bon0731.outbound.protection.outlook.com [IPv6:2a01:111:f400:fc10::1:731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfc.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CDCA21CD869; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 14:44:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.27) by BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.162.224.30) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.1.427.16; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:43:46 +0000
Received: from BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) by BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com ([10.162.224.27]) with mapi id 15.01.0427.019; Mon, 7 Mar 2016 22:43:46 +0000
From: Ronald Bonica <rbonica@juniper.net>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>, "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
Subject: RE: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01
Thread-Index: AQHRde+vpur3jempfUO2BKkuKIZdl59J2NsAgACCjYCAAqk5gIAAXPsAgAE4DHA=
Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:43:46 +0000
Message-ID: <BLUPR05MB1985775DFEFF7D4BE83D39D5AEB10@BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
References: <56D946D2.4020607@si6networks.com> <56DA0756.8070801@gmail.com> <56DA74D9.40304@si6networks.com> <B98CA008-EB3B-495B-BF63-857A58D44580@cisco.com> <56DCFE4C.4000205@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <56DCFE4C.4000205@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=juniper.net;
x-originating-ip: [66.129.241.12]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 2c3d31bc-2db0-4ef2-6635-08d346d9f1d2
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; BLUPR05MB1988; 5:sNXpHygT8TcCO3k6CegiTnxZNWl3/Zoo9kxduIXyLYGCvQn3xFx2FyjlLiP+QaQjmSSYuGcaO7JHaPUMzz/wQovWC6u/BWFWnNccjOvRz5UTslpEND0m/PYhV6huSKY+Qep1fm/KsZUZs0JRcctGLw==; 24:TWylcbGcWZYepBEvsMY1z9YkQ3O/e4Dfv1A4AbnyS/805VCfkrQYXK8fdpNV/fqM+AiN+c16MiMBiEfFu/Sf0uRaGhzDXqNsw+nCY6oIaNU=
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988;
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <BLUPR05MB1988F038826A8CB0ECC09716AEB10@BLUPR05MB1988.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(95692535739014);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(10201501046)(3002001); SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988;
x-forefront-prvs: 087474FBFA
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(13464003)(24454002)(377454003)(252514010)(479174004)(106116001)(586003)(1220700001)(11100500001)(4326007)(50986999)(40100003)(76176999)(76576001)(19580405001)(66066001)(3660700001)(99286002)(5003600100002)(230783001)(3280700002)(10400500002)(2900100001)(6116002)(3846002)(5008740100001)(102836003)(2950100001)(54356999)(1096002)(81166005)(77096005)(87936001)(5004730100002)(189998001)(93886004)(5001770100001)(33656002)(92566002)(19580395003)(2906002)(122556002)(74316001)(86362001)(5002640100001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:BLUPR05MB1988; H:BLUPR05MB1985.namprd05.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; MLV:sfv; LANG:en;
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Mar 2016 22:43:46.7379 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: bea78b3c-4cdb-4130-854a-1d193232e5f4
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: BLUPR05MB1988
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/gXE0BAyAIVGk1P9iL6OwC77YJHs>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Mar 2016 22:44:04 -0000

Brian,

That's OK by me.

                         Ron


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2016 11:07 PM
> To: Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com>; Fernando Gont
> <fgont@si6networks.com>
> Cc: 6man@ietf.org; draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Review of draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-01
> 
> On 07/03/2016 11:33, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> > Something to discuss wth the chairs, I suppose. The first question is
> whether 2460bis is ready about when it is, or one is later.
> >
> > I'd like to believe this is close to done, and I suspect Bob would like to
> believe 2460bis is close to done.... If so, the chairs may prefer to somehow
> incorporate it into 2460bis and ship it.
> 
> I don't see that happening, because 2460bis is supposed to be aimed at
> Internet Standard status and that requires solid operational experience for all
> features. hbh-header-handling is some years from that situation,
> unfortunately. So I can only see it as a Proposed Standard update to the
> future Internet Standard.
> 
> (You may recall draft-loughney-newtrk-one-size-fits-all. I always thought that
> would have saved us a lot of bureaucracy.)
> 
>    Brian
> 
> >> On Mar 5, 2016, at 6:55 AM, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> On 03/04/2016 07:08 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Also, I would suggest sequencing this draft to come out *after* 2460bis.
> >>> It might have the distinction of being the first RFC to update 2460bis.
> >>
> >> Not that I like to point this out, but...
> >> One one hand, if we're working on rfc2460bis, then one would argue
> >> that if we're to intentionally stall
> >> draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling so that it gets published after
> >> rfc2460bis, then why not incorporate it in rfc2460bis?
> >>
> >> I'd expect that this doc is published soon & as is: It updates
> >> RFC2460... and then rfc2460bis picks RFC2460 plus updates.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Fernando Gont
> >> SI6 Networks
> >> e-mail: fgont@si6networks.com
> >> PGP Fingerprint: 6666 31C6 D484 63B2 8FB1 E3C4 AE25 0D55 1D4E 7492
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email