Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)

"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 09:10 UTC

Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88951A86E9; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:10:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPloTozStRwH; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:10:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7F21A19F7; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:10:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.12.0.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150305091017.21885.28715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:10:17 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/SCczz0POL-1EWb3ItrwQnzZphCE>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, ot@cisco.com, tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk, draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad.all@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:10:18 -0000

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You should precise when using the RFC 2119 keywords
OLD:
   A Service Provider router, such as an access concentrator, or network
   core router, SHOULD support this mitigation strategy.

NEW:
   A Service Provider router, such as an access concentrator, or network
   core router, SHOULD support the DAD desactivation per interface 

Same remark for "this solution" in
   This solution SHOULD be enabled by default, and MUST be a
   configurable option if the layer-2 technology provides means for
   detecting loopback messages on an interface circuit.

Please expand it.