Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)
"Benoit Claise" <bclaise@cisco.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 09:10 UTC
Return-Path: <bclaise@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C88951A86E9; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:10:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YPloTozStRwH; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:10:17 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B7F21A19F7; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 01:10:17 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.12.0.p2
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20150305091017.21885.28715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 01:10:17 -0800
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/SCczz0POL-1EWb3ItrwQnzZphCE>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org, ot@cisco.com, tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk, draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad.all@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 09:10:18 -0000
Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- You should precise when using the RFC 2119 keywords OLD: A Service Provider router, such as an access concentrator, or network core router, SHOULD support this mitigation strategy. NEW: A Service Provider router, such as an access concentrator, or network core router, SHOULD support the DAD desactivation per interface Same remark for "this solution" in This solution SHOULD be enabled by default, and MUST be a configurable option if the layer-2 technology provides means for detecting loopback messages on an interface circuit. Please expand it.
- Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-e… Benoit Claise
- RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6m… Hemant Singh (shemant)