IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)

"Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com> Thu, 05 March 2015 12:16 UTC

Return-Path: <shemant@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 426BF1B2C48; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:16:52 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KwfaSsClcomy; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:16:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-3.cisco.com (alln-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.142.90]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 68BBD1B2C47; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 04:16:48 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=2350; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1425557809; x=1426767409; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=xcd50a3JCIjTgjpzdXkQ3zpVjVkV1p/py0jA0jXwsIg=; b=aYtaFNFWywFwZegI/ijRDgcvaF6TUp8shm6hQZnNBXLW6Z18vP6odbnw yhRp+75HPJX1pbfFretP+/5EptgYGnZaArE6nEt+YWfFBi/nhj4oOPp+f fD4m89M4U2L7ATNElp6fVqEdhEacqaD2HjtM/r/6cEf0mjm57EBMOuVpl U=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,346,1422921600"; d="scan'208";a="129184381"
Received: from rcdn-core-2.cisco.com ([173.37.93.153]) by alln-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 05 Mar 2015 12:16:48 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com [173.36.12.84]) by rcdn-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t25CGlvF031693 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Thu, 5 Mar 2015 12:16:47 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([169.254.6.40]) by xhc-aln-x10.cisco.com ([173.36.12.84]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Thu, 5 Mar 2015 06:16:47 -0600
From: "Hemant Singh (shemant)" <shemant@cisco.com>
To: "Benoit Claise (bclaise)" <bclaise@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Topic: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHQVyQ05byzrErGbkKE/W502bJu5p0Nzh9w
Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:16:47 +0000
Message-ID: <75B6FA9F576969419E42BECB86CB1B891681236D@xmb-rcd-x06.cisco.com>
References: <20150305091017.21885.28715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20150305091017.21885.28715.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.86.252.185]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/pV7JmUUx9BAwGRpfMtDgJA_YK94>
Cc: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>, "ot@cisco.com" <ot@cisco.com>, "tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk" <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, "draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad.all@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad.all@ietf.org>, "6man-chairs@ietf.org" <6man-chairs@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2015 12:16:52 -0000

Benoit,

Will do - thanks for the review.

Regards,

Hemant

-----Original Message-----
From: Benoit Claise (bclaise) 
Sent: Thursday, March 05, 2015 4:10 AM
To: The IESG
Cc: tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk; 6man-chairs@ietf.org; ot@cisco.com; draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad.all@ietf.org; ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Benoit Claise's No Objection on draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: (with COMMENT)

Benoit Claise has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad-14: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-enhanced-dad/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

You should precise when using the RFC 2119 keywords
OLD:
   A Service Provider router, such as an access concentrator, or network
   core router, SHOULD support this mitigation strategy.

NEW:
   A Service Provider router, such as an access concentrator, or network
   core router, SHOULD support the DAD desactivation per interface 

Same remark for "this solution" in
   This solution SHOULD be enabled by default, and MUST be a
   configurable option if the layer-2 technology provides means for
   detecting loopback messages on an interface circuit.

Please expand it.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email