IETF Logo Mail Archive

[IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Android now supports DHCPv6 PD

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Wed, 17 September 2025 00:05 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Delivered-To: ipv6@mail2.ietf.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D81E263ECF6A for <ipv6@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at ietf.org
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: mail2.ietf.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail2.ietf.org ([166.84.6.31]) by localhost (mail2.ietf.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X1YXaawlJWsZ for <ipv6@mail2.ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl1-x629.google.com (mail-pl1-x629.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::629]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail2.ietf.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6950D63ECF54 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-24457f581aeso60891435ad.0 for <6man@ietf.org>; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20230601; t=1758067525; x=1758672325; darn=ietf.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=fEvT4EtpsUBPNqD+zEH1JJPk5BnKxmt5QTBtLBqUgDc=; b=xb1Rt0BN6ly5akm/SAVqBokVdP5W9KiNjCxkW3ORJN1VoQjcHiLX0jBixJOma4ky8d VMO3AdKPU/mm4d2V+HC17dJaK/36AOqTM2nX8N6lb/bTZJFmKHN52PtuRsneqlfhAOnh Ygianq58hq44YVJfJDJl4ZaKY+MOqzXLJpg6SyO0CfwgL/Z6cArJyIH9hmzet9kXNae3 aN0i476p0mUhqzrEKVjKSBAGA0rjM3aoWHCaoqah1tGzrZ2yPUZHWXV1SZWxD7CB2NrA W6sutGPpptBLc52FaJnKex18PZYe8Uejib253enwFbOVMqBZ5Z30OnBZiuMsu1zR5NSZ /0Vw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1758067525; x=1758672325; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=fEvT4EtpsUBPNqD+zEH1JJPk5BnKxmt5QTBtLBqUgDc=; b=qVcu4q5B9zVU9XZgGw29XahqepGDSZNIQ4js6y9ZybT7YyHjdJmJUBQZV654270l7U fktonLh7uC6h65Lxlv0yBlZ9pk6M5SPBukqtqyK2G8trMZAt6ZSfzomJpVtUK15PhAk7 OuQrL8kFAsWWDmvw7EX0SU7efCF/+8lodolraS1pWIUUtbdWaQOjzo4SPrpe1rrHH+gK i1GmGjSdhCMLq/UFMt12FIjS2daU+SqvXSseSd8JoPVx7UK1lOqs+E24zHa0ohO284Z7 5pVFrlXBftgFleNnz8CbYMS+fbpOo7qVimf0ffifie6u2U1PorS5dR5dL9siCwZS3L0G VV/Q==
X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCWFEBiD7ngmenkuP40DbirsBnHx+IcKSQ05j2HVuyiUH6Xuy17g+U5oVR1HFfTeddqCXxeN@ietf.org
X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxU3pZEKS4NkwF508qr1/ZTFricAeX8haZKh0YMdV4u/Z794Ood /ROhapTS3wu6hwRtFatLl2UAyS8+YTwKYiEEM8vz8hvy86D6207HX0uMsFEPDPZIRxdmJ6+N5AQ 6PKUXV51P4aDryerGpdIkKYUVV70w3+3exJ1QyGOZ
X-Gm-Gg: ASbGnctgdUNb1vWI0XUo+nYBtSPSY8JNHoezG6HhWL8OMJvf3vQsJdj8U9ffz6vTW4/ 9WRH1eNGf6dplqvUgWNuQuW5Zl7B0r9G2jYgUnqQEaZcdram1EKJtImOeDyZfQUxSw8RNGhbxCy SMuZWqRZ8E/tAsLgOfkBulsC8vAAKto6yb6CbaEIyxDToRL+HvXnwvzXdNYhCIyb8Zw+y4tzop8 8NE9+o/OiwJMbOXg9+dEUokWBF3ur2DDclvxvRyKGByV2TT
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IFIpa2KogzJORj6ThJxOdMTWDRE95vfiKs+1z/p1SK56Vdv3/UcVxP1PeZ55EfQpDIgL2sBkplsAaeU8OQ2nY4=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:2c7:b0:267:4b13:c855 with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-2681217a94fmr1361425ad.14.1758067525218; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 17:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAKD1Yr1XKoBNJqBbuiR1ZthZPTqaN+099RdhhHTSSGJBF5EUpw@mail.gmail.com> <CAP6_FRxO5Oem05cAMOuKK=ckR6VOG_pQteJzNkjES6czSVmvdw@mail.gmail.com> <CANP3RGcAhHX859-9EW4ozUJYYHaeaYsK7pqbBb-ytuqyT-ZTEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr32GdvEhh7kKCuPT3RGoKo0ojo-W6Kiy-euD1aP9RjpLg@mail.gmail.com> <DB9PR07MB7771A785A9FF09DEA6E66D7DD614A@DB9PR07MB7771.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CAKD1Yr1g8=6B9o4BNtrKaeLvTajuQ8P4rjv-N+15UOAMXPujhA@mail.gmail.com> <aMl8I5H8zgIDNeWD@Space.Net>
In-Reply-To: <aMl8I5H8zgIDNeWD@Space.Net>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 09:05:09 +0900
X-Gm-Features: AS18NWAOzjIXFCG5M_19g_xEf3G51beQ7LDmNNJgU0u3UNB1U5J_JQ2vxCaJK7A
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1b-uxP0EtXJpXDZcAVdQ78wXFDE24LHZNkEhdyypazxQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Gert Doering <gert@space.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000055a40a063ef3fe2d"
Message-ID-Hash: B3CBG5DCPXERJPJJQPHQYDPHETBEHGBN
X-Message-ID-Hash: B3CBG5DCPXERJPJJQPHQYDPHETBEHGBN
X-MailFrom: lorenzo@google.com
X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-ipv6.ietf.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header
CC: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>, Maciej ??enczykowski <maze@google.com>, 6man <6man@ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>, dhcwg <dhcwg@ietf.org>
X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.9rc6
Precedence: list
Subject: [IPv6]Re: [v6ops] Re: Re: Android now supports DHCPv6 PD
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group (6man)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/TPa97T4DIgeRfCD7vWLxn31SiQc>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Owner: <mailto:ipv6-owner@ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:ipv6-join@ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:ipv6-leave@ietf.org>

On Wed, Sep 17, 2025 at 12:03 AM Gert Doering <gert@space.net> wrote:

> > Recommendations for network operators are written in RFC 9663. Some text
> > about expected prefix lengths is in section 8 of that RFC. RFC 9762 says
> > the prefix must be SLAAC-sized, which currently means it must be a /64
> per
> > device. A /48 is fine for a small or medium network, but a campus with
> tens
> > of thousands of devices on it probably needs more than that.
>
> If but anyone had warned of this outcome before.
>

That you did. and I assume it's fair to say you will also oppose an attempt
to change this policy? Or is it worth trying to change it?

v2.46.0 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status