Re: Working Group Last Call for <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark>

Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com> Thu, 24 December 2020 01:41 UTC

Return-Path: <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47A853A0B37 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:41:18 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XrObqfFFg_WO for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:41:16 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lf1-x134.google.com (mail-lf1-x134.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E72DA3A0B36 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:41:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lf1-x134.google.com with SMTP id 23so1577296lfg.10 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:41:15 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ERMbeGww/ezWg0vX+UMegRy2895wV07hTj0iRlmqIRo=; b=l8UL7e+SkONlJjdO+6LCSxLKK6+r8lyx3r4ryocv/lHFNzJ2YCOYX42RR9drQmivWz l8Y+7KNnOsOZ0rQOxC4c3NpTmEofQy45bp/GXrjRxGK5VD982TM47PdOXEGXWCdO9iKD 6RCLYptxp6d0dheByBRP41Y3BwHnCQ2EXCKPU9jvVFao5LDRE88eT+JNHsSaBqfmxz0F QRda94fxRyTNL0GpgDV9aGzYjehHaDtB282+/y+coECAgUZR7ioIWiQ2p9L6ZnbSLOvy xJcNWRXaFVURpUW7B5Bkp7Fxozi+PS7flg3B1p3EMB3CpNCKHJQrLYgWIcs++cGC3mBD YYKQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ERMbeGww/ezWg0vX+UMegRy2895wV07hTj0iRlmqIRo=; b=lV7bglqK4R0JOcr9m893hMHEJlVJDFi5ohDVJQqAW8ckWRRVX2FmSCXTt/hbk1k6+y PPzk/O0YIiPTE4X6q83Ipc04+JiPFW2pXNQ5XAnPgANJ9tv1VV/cu8CnCUF166QOBSS5 08SCVoUq5k2RgipvVwusOgMpqmSleteaGdgew9Iid+jO6QngzZ2yOWyE8+QRF8FW00nn N4BZf7Vkn2jytHUro3xAY4c+FOesahzXctaXnhA/opBEJB1G5FiEWH7U9zwjgGlZcFpF AdxW9oNGQpW0jLCRPUGGOcY1j2vOtSAmwLIkf09H9vBWevr8ekom5DKwwjjUER0H4d5F 5LQA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533HfqlmBsLV/GWMohc3HZBb76kbGOhXWfu8pxIjmG2KZwlemO9S bKEU3tXnGMxNf/le/D8j+u0q+0EXXulpMTvul9o=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEu5PWnO1+flLAUiZPsnbTlUOKhDEj7OP/wrvJbLIIX4Lbdu/aCGwxU1xo2TMe2Gh+ux9kzj4XR8keuYl0NiI=
X-Received: by 2002:ac2:50c1:: with SMTP id h1mr12709553lfm.350.1608774073710; Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:41:13 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <160022348671.28445.8378620622786303015@ietfa.amsl.com> <7154EC82-1F39-404B-A98B-F656A4CB19BA@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <7154EC82-1F39-404B-A98B-F656A4CB19BA@gmail.com>
From: Greg Mirsky <gregimirsky@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 17:41:02 -0800
Message-ID: <CA+RyBmXt5KJ7bbJ==g6z8a1d-pLgP6jVCf6F+vGjc6M+qL0Akg@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Working Group Last Call for <draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
Cc: IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000002ffc3005b72be700"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/XEJxawUYm3ekJ_f6Zyo2RdK_4OY>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2020 01:41:18 -0000

Dear All,
I've read the draft and I support its publication.

I have a question related to the operation of a node that applies the
Alternate Marking to a flow. As I understand it, the marking node (let's
call it that) will add an IPv6 header with the Options Header that includes
the AltMark Option. Is my understanding correct? If it is, then there would
be an impact on the packet sizes for the monitored flow. Some packets with
the additional IPv6 header might exceed the MTU. Should that be noted in
the Security Considerations? Can it be mitigated?

Also, text can benefit from editorial updates. I can give it a try if the
authors like to send me a text copy.

Regards,
Greg

On Sun, Dec 20, 2020 at 11:11 AM Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:

> This message starts a new three week 6MAN Working Group Last Call on
> advancing:
>
>        Title           : IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method
>        Authors         : Giuseppe Fioccola
>                          Tianran Zhou
>                          Mauro Cociglio
>                          Fengwei Qin
>                          Ran Pang
>         Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-02.txt
>         Pages           : 15
>         Date            : 2020-10-13
>
> as a Proposed Standard.  We normally do two week last calls, but given the
> holidays, we think three weeks is appropriate.
>
> Substantive comments and statements of support for publishing this
> document should be directed to the ipv6@ietf.org mailing list.  Editorial
> suggestions can be sent to the authors.  This last call will end on 10
> January 2021.
>
> Thanks,
> Bob & Ole
>
>
>
> > Begin forwarded message:
> >
> > From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
> > Subject: I-D Action: draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-02.txt
> > Date: October 13, 2020 at 7:10:42 AM PDT
> > To: <i-d-announce@ietf.org>
> > Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
> > Reply-To: ipv6@ietf.org
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> directories.
> > This draft is a work item of the IPv6 Maintenance WG of the IETF.
> >
> >        Title           : IPv6 Application of the Alternate Marking Method
> >        Authors         : Giuseppe Fioccola
> >                          Tianran Zhou
> >                          Mauro Cociglio
> >                          Fengwei Qin
> >                          Ran Pang
> >       Filename        : draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-02.txt
> >       Pages           : 15
> >       Date            : 2020-10-13
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document describes how the Alternate Marking Method can be used
> >   as the passive performance measurement tool in an IPv6 domain and
> >   reports implementation considerations.  It proposes how to define a
> >   new Extension Header Option to encode alternate marking technique and
> >   both Hop-by-Hop Options Header and Destination Options Header are
> >   considered.
> >
> >
> >
> > The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark/
> >
> > There are also htmlized versions available at:
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-02
> > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-02
> >
> > A diff from the previous version is available at:
> > https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-alt-mark-02
> >
> >
> > Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of
> submission
> > until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
> >
> > Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> > ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
> >
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>