Re: <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis>
Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov> Fri, 06 January 2017 22:38 UTC
Return-Path: <crawdad@fnal.gov>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4FE91295FB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:38:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.902
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.902 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=fermicloud.onmicrosoft.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hKXFFFgZo7Ut for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:38:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gcc01-CY1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-cy1gcc01on0098.outbound.protection.outlook.com [23.103.200.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC0341295DB for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 14:38:32 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fermicloud.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-fnal-gov; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=8/PK86rR+Qqke4tsAknpzfTFrYGZdcGBeZ0F4NCTYVc=; b=Qa5bL5UCe8d56sVYfBW+uiH10LJaRnZyTRL49I730t7lDTBHJHKzLsog0UxtNGzK3Z73oZnHpAtCVYkvr+wAlig9feXFQTgiyFDvV13tDuVDMEGu+FYA4nwgFbVeZ4F5+TKew99N64GGTes94lX1Lpiww45mmM3Q7wA+w7LJ9X8=
Received: from DM2PR09MB0269.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.160.93.155) by DM2PR09MB0272.namprd09.prod.outlook.com (10.160.96.141) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384_P384) id 15.1.817.10; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:38:30 +0000
Received: from DM2PR09MB0269.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.93.155]) by DM2PR09MB0269.namprd09.prod.outlook.com ([10.160.93.155]) with mapi id 15.01.0817.009; Fri, 6 Jan 2017 22:38:30 +0000
From: Matt Crawford <crawdad@fnal.gov>
To: "ipv6@ietf.org" <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis>
Thread-Topic: <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis>
Thread-Index: AQHSaG2a0Xi96x/9SkKCXmp4d/PIjA==
Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:38:29 +0000
Message-ID: <D44B80FD-33CC-43B2-A21C-A54E6E7AEDA6@fnal.gov>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=crawdad@fnal.gov;
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-originating-ip: [2620:6a:0:87:202c:55a0:dcc3:6527]
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: c50d3a12-efc4-45f9-f69e-08d43684bcfd
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(22001);SRVR:DM2PR09MB0272;
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; DM2PR09MB0272; 7:O5FtrNSmkAQwaYD4XtTdJ1m0csKXg96REgltty1MU92yiEr/YXBQC/m+hGlQ0zRp1bDqUdbVGuXWmu9+Xdg63YZ/ArZEXwAHa5DEMLyy50ZJJUNCD7q13mEiq2UC+HeZNl/Jjiyi+uPzg911kVO7f/9OrgILuRaQ8Mnpsps6GRxU9fJ9Sqy3FzZtESfXmXalTQD4zFS59crfXhPTFt9UbAPkl9lMDgJzvBaiJcySIpRnPfoLEfktxE2Iu89gIttfogTXyp1sXbQuBWkX5DbJKPwkRbyf8h3xQjABy4RkDLVXCXZT/N3uD+dBbrCyCxgEKWf7lTxV/yaS2xlT6jtPRkWTQdhPRJGV+8DK6mJJU/S+9r8cULNESFtgK9a7IT4ExUZ6+ss9zOIysf2LI/sU2RaHhPzznvQA1vPggSGNSDZDCes20OZJdQlZwCiGPZfJjEXib1zR0nqs97RrfGjQsA==
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <DM2PR09MB0272545553D6B5EDFBD902C2C9630@DM2PR09MB0272.namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(243157700288050)(40475595445134);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040375)(601004)(2401047)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046)(6055026)(6041248)(20161123564025)(20161123562025)(20161123555025)(20161123560025)(6072148); SRVR:DM2PR09MB0272; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0272;
x-forefront-prvs: 01792087B6
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10019020)(6009001)(7916002)(39410400002)(39850400002)(39450400003)(39840400002)(199003)(189002)(83716003)(2501003)(81156014)(81166006)(8676002)(6306002)(36756003)(82746002)(6506006)(2906002)(8936002)(229853002)(92566002)(33656002)(6486002)(77096006)(68736007)(99286003)(86362001)(105586002)(107886002)(5660300001)(106356001)(2900100001)(5640700003)(38730400001)(450100001)(106116001)(305945005)(7736002)(2351001)(122556002)(110136003)(6916009)(230783001)(50986999)(101416001)(97736004)(3660700001)(54356999)(25786008)(189998001)(6436002)(3280700002)(6512007)(6116002)(102836003)(104396002)(18886065003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1102; SCL:1; SRVR:DM2PR09MB0272; H:DM2PR09MB0269.namprd09.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en;
received-spf: None (protection.outlook.com: fnal.gov does not designate permitted sender hosts)
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <08A7DC3B7881DF489CDA511AFC043A4F@namprd09.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: fnal.gov
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 06 Jan 2017 22:38:29.7373 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 9d5f83d3-d338-4fd3-b1c9-b7d94d70255a
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: DM2PR09MB0272
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/_4uP56edHBnQnBLQbwQTZ7m2JiU>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2017 22:41:36 -0000
> I created a baseline draft for doing an RFC2464bis for Internet Standard. This seem to me like a good one to start working on since the other core IPv6 drafts have been submitted to the IESG. > […] > > The plan is to do a small series of new versions, each addressing a single update to allow the changes to be tracked very carefully. Please review this draft to verify there are no content changes. I have carefully compared your -00 draft to RFC 2464 and find no substantive differences except the addition of the IANA Considerations section and updating some of the references. Matt Crawford Project Manager Office of the CIO Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory http://www.fnal.gov/
- <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis> Bob Hinden
- Re: <draft-hinden-6man-rfc2464bis> Matt Crawford