IETF Logo Mail Archive

RE: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies

"S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com> Fri, 27 February 2004 07:26 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17968 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:26:52 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwcO8-0000Yk-5z for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:26:25 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1R7QO1M002144 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:26:24 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwcO7-0000YV-RY for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:26:23 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17896 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:26:20 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwcO4-0005tb-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:26:20 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AwcNB-0005mn-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:25:25 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwcMG-0005fh-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:24:28 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwcLq-00085W-Tx; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:24:02 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwcL8-0007qe-Q0 for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:23:18 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id CAA17549 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:23:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwcL5-0005Wu-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:23:15 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AwcKC-0005Qj-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:22:21 -0500
Received: from mailout3.samsung.com ([203.254.224.33]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwcJn-0005Jt-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:21:55 -0500
Received: from custom-daemon.mailout3.samsung.com by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) id <0HTQ00946EURIR@mailout3.samsung.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:16:03 +0900 (KST)
Received: from ep_mmp1 (mailout3.samsung.com [203.254.224.33]) by mailout3.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HTQ00F0TETRQA@mailout3.samsung.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:15:27 +0900 (KST)
Received: from LocalHost ([168.219.202.103]) by mmp1.samsung.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.17 (built Jun 23 2003)) with ESMTPA id <0HTQ003IVETRJ5@mmp1.samsung.com> for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:15:27 +0900 (KST)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:15:30 +0900
From: "S. Daniel Park" <soohong.park@samsung.com>
Subject: RE: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies
In-reply-to: <y7vwu6aj9vs.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
To: 'JINMEI Tatuya / ?���B��' <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>, 'Markku Savela' <msa@burp.tkv.asdf.org>
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Message-id: <00bc01c3fd01$7ba1c5e0$67cadba8@LocalHost>
MIME-version: 1.0
X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.2627
Content-type: text/plain; charset="ks_c_5601-1987"
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Importance: Normal
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-priority: Normal
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

> > And even with single id and new prefix this is not good: on 
> > RA with a new global prefix, every node on the link is going to do 
> > DAD based on its ID and new prefix. And, as far as I know, 
> > there is no delay requirement here, so everyone is doing it at
> > same time.
>
> Hmm, this is a good point.  An obvious workaround is to impose a
> random delay when the node is starting a DAD process for an address
> configured by multicasted RA.
> 
> Does this kind of additional requirement make sense? > all
> If so, should we include this in rfc2462bis?

no change in the main sentence but add an appendix (or
something) to discuss the issue on the random delays of
the multiple RAs...but isn't bound for multi6 ?

Regards



- Daniel (Soohong Daniel Park)
- Mobile Platform Laboratory, SAMSUNG Electronics. 



--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email