IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies

"Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org> Fri, 27 February 2004 05:44 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA01051 for <ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:44:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Awan6-0002p9-Ff for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:44:04 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i1R5i4TL010849 for ipv6-archive@odin.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:44:04 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Awan6-0002ou-Bm for ipv6-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:44:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA00995 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:44:00 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Awan3-0003bQ-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:44:01 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Awam6-0003Su-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:43:02 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Awal8-0003Me-00 for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:42:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Awal7-0002Sg-Vs; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:42:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AwakA-00029W-SS for ipv6@optimus.ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:41:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id AAA00885 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:40:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Awak8-0003Gi-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:41:00 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AwajE-0003CF-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:40:05 -0500
Received: from dsl-2.241.240.220.dsl.comindico.com.au ([220.240.241.2] helo=anchovy.zoic.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AwaiW-00037v-00 for ipv6@ietf.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:39:20 -0500
Received: by anchovy.zoic.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 56AD471B801; Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:39:13 +1100 (EST)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 16:39:13 +1100
From: Nick 'Sharkey' Moore <sharkey@zoic.org>
To: ipv6@ietf.org
Cc: "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H" <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
Subject: Re: [rfc2462bis issue 275] DAD text inconsistencies
Message-ID: <20040227053912.GA26483@zoic.org>
Mail-Followup-To: ipv6@ietf.org, "JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H" <jinmei@isl.rdc.toshiba.co.jp>
References: <y7v1xomorrm.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <y7v8yiqkzfs.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <200402260946.i1Q9kwo8006390@burp.tkv.asdf.org> <y7vwu6aj9vs.wl@ocean.jinmei.org> <200402261325.i1QDPDcR008250@burp.tkv.asdf.org> <20040226200901.GB23217@zoic.org> <20040226234049.GA24880@zoic.org> <403E9E2C.3040208@eng.monash.edu.au> <20040227024408.GB24880@zoic.org> <y7vishtjdej.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <y7vishtjdej.wl@ocean.jinmei.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-URL: http://zoic.org/sharkey/
Sender: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: IP Version 6 Working Group (ipv6) <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60

On 2004-02-27, JINMEI Tatuya / ?$B?@L@C#:H wrote:
> "Nick 'Sharkey' Moore" <sharkey@zoic.org> said:
> > 
> > NB:  Is there a plan for 3041bis?  It's rather bound up with
> > DIID too.
> 
> A quick response.  I guess you are talking about the following part of
> RFC3041: [...] (the last paragraph of Section 3.3)

Yep, and the other references to 'Interface Identifier' throughout,
since we're no longer really making up an II and generating
addresses from it, we're just making up random suffixes.  Well,
that's how I'd see it, anyway.

> However, RFC3041 actually has a successor,
> draft-ietf-ipngwg-temp-addresses-v2-00.txt (expired for a long period
> though),  which reversed the logic:

Ah, thanks, I hadn't seen that.  I'll have a read.  I guess
that'd be the basis for 3041bis if we decide we need one.

-----Nick
-- 
Nick 'Sharkey' Moore  <sharkey@zoic.org>  <http://zoic.org/sharkey/>
"In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people
very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move."
	-- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email