IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: L=0 [was draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02.txt]

Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org> Thu, 01 February 2018 18:23 UTC

Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1397B12EC62 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:23:24 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.911
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.911 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BLHGdgBntYJc for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:23:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from accordion.employees.org (accordion.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A9CE1315F4 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 10:22:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from h.hanazo.no (96.51-175-103.customer.lyse.net [51.175.103.96]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by accordion.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9E59B2D51FA; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 18:22:39 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by h.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19E9C201A162C3; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 19:22:38 +0100 (CET)
From: Ole Troan <otroan@employees.org>
Message-Id: <F915EEAE-0035-4AF3-99F7-AD26BD769F4D@employees.org>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CF53AEDC-31EA-4716-9AB2-90D01FE23007"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.2 \(3445.5.20\))
Subject: Re: L=0 [was draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02.txt]
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 19:22:37 +0100
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011832480.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se>
Cc: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
To: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
References: <91953634-9B4A-405B-AB36-FBB2079A0A40@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr23G+rz7woT1K504UEb2=sQGJd2p_CcQogLA5BbmTomZA@mail.gmail.com> <32FB86D8-235A-434F-A20C-6624FB7C3CE2@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr1oTmBOQR7YJnJV3S9_NG54sA-+phzRMwPT5qQcF1nKPA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311327410.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr04NV0+r1V1XnOo9XUu2GF_RiVPN6pqM0pJ0a68=mC9Zw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311402350.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2cTdK+kkojHa5qPOO4VyT=jW1pmJmf=uXSrdif404iQQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802010954270.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr28iU=jCBv7dy4D8gyeL=uB5hFu-YhGOKPiih9sykZ1GQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011138010.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <658076313dd5488080a596717d00c19b@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011733380.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <d9091a6779aa47cc905a1fdb76480b84@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011805250.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <c3357bf41dab4c268039fa8fe463bc8f@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011832480.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/dsZdTnX6K5e9nBXhShx2NOgsSYs>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 18:23:24 -0000

> If we just gave up the idea that the DHCPv6 server lives anywhere else than on a router (with all consequences that has), that would solve some parts of my issues with it.

DHCPv6 PD has never been specified for any other model.
What this has to do with PIO-X I have no idea.

Cheers,
Ole

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email