RE: L=0 [was draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02.txt]

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Thu, 01 February 2018 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3130412EC04 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:35:11 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.31
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.31 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=swm.pp.se
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sg50Anp7NhlB for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A995E12EB83 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 08:35:09 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 25370B1; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:35:08 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=swm.pp.se; s=mail; t=1517502908; bh=9NODewhwtShpPFU/seLnl5g8pjo4GZPa48zg9o0d7bk=; h=Date:From:To:cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=qHYCpC7niyWu8P/r9ScfQDSQlJcfvGBMI9PlbMQUGs/+6vP3o154dWRSNxl4lj8dk qmR7NlwcA+EtBvqWO489ABMBpBw5iAroSEs2GvASST7QETJ0bL9UERf1KguMIK1HCA T8lVTpQRUVTrBrgKGi7Y2gEHklB8pfkgfo9cfgwk=
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F3AB0; Thu, 1 Feb 2018 17:35:08 +0100 (CET)
Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 17:35:08 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Templin, Fred L" <Fred.L.Templin@boeing.com>
cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: L=0 [was draft-pioxfolks-6man-pio-exclusive-bit-02.txt]
In-Reply-To: <658076313dd5488080a596717d00c19b@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011733380.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <91953634-9B4A-405B-AB36-FBB2079A0A40@gmail.com> <CAO42Z2ydjfsvL0ita9TW8Hgrqfd30E6BSPAf0DmLn0cZaCt3tg@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311042240.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311125400.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <91E4B0D5-BB27-4961-883B-0774729F1A83@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr23G+rz7woT1K504UEb2=sQGJd2p_CcQogLA5BbmTomZA@mail.gmail.com> <32FB86D8-235A-434F-A20C-6624FB7C3CE2@employees.org> <CAKD1Yr1oTmBOQR7YJnJV3S9_NG54sA-+phzRMwPT5qQcF1nKPA@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311327410.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr04NV0+r1V1XnOo9XUu2GF_RiVPN6pqM0pJ0a68=mC9Zw@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1801311402350.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr2cTdK+kkojHa5qPOO4VyT=jW1pmJmf=uXSrdif404iQQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802010954270.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <CAKD1Yr28iU=jCBv7dy4D8gyeL=uB5hFu-YhGOKPiih9sykZ1GQ@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.DEB.2.20.1802011138010.8884@uplift.swm.pp.se> <658076313dd5488080a596717d00c19b@XCH15-06-08.nw.nos.boeing.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.20 (DEB 67 2015-01-07)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/uguAgapMHRKIzouj8BtCIwH3294>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2018 16:35:11 -0000

On Thu, 1 Feb 2018, Templin, Fred L wrote:

> But, efforts to get that standardized fizzled on multiple occasions 
> simply because there was no perceived need for it.

Considering how vendors get it wrong (personal experience), I'd say I do 
not share this opinion that there is no perceived need for it.

Also, in my discussions with people it seems to me that some think that 
"snooping" is the wrong thing to do so they're opposed to this approach 
completely.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se