Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete]
EricLKlein@SoftHome.net Mon, 18 April 2005 11:12 UTC
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DNUAt-0007p0-Uq; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:12:19 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DNUAs-0007op-Cx for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:12:18 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id HAA07692 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:12:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: EricLKlein@SoftHome.net
Received: from jive.softhome.net ([66.54.152.27]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with smtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DNULa-000694-Ft for ipv6@ietf.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 07:23:28 -0400
Received: (qmail 23958 invoked by uid 417); 18 Apr 2005 11:12:05 -0000
Received: from tango-.softhome.net (HELO softhome.net) (172.16.2.14) by shunt-smtp-com-out-com-0 with SMTP; 18 Apr 2005 11:12:05 -0000
Received: from pro.softhome.net ([192.168.255.4]) (AUTH: LOGIN EricLKlein@softhome.net) by softhome.net with esmtp; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:12:05 -0600
Received: from 130.237.124.240 (SquirrelMail authenticated user EricLKlein@SoftHome.net) by pro.SoftHome.net with HTTP; Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:12:05 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <2614.130.237.124.240.1113822725.squirrel@pro.SoftHome.net>
In-Reply-To: <42620A5D.4070700@zurich.ibm.com>
References: <42620A5D.4070700@zurich.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 05:12:05 -0600
To: ipv6@ietf.org
User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.4
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Importance: Normal
X-Mime-Autoconverted: from 8bit to 7bit by courier 0.38
X-Spam-Score: 1.1 (+)
X-Scan-Signature: 8b30eb7682a596edff707698f4a80f7d
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete]
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
This may seem a little petty, but based on the abstract and title of this
one, shouldn't the line
Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
be changed from none to 1888?
Eric
> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete
> Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2005 12:20:00 -0700
> From: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
> To: ietf-announce@ietf.org
> CC: rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
>
>
> A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries.
>
>
> RFC 4048
>
> Title: RFC 1888 Is Obsolete
> Authors: B. Carpenter
> Status: Informational
> Date: April 2005
> Mailbox: brc@zurich.ibm.com
> Pages: 4
> Characters: 7394
> Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso: None
>
> I-D Tag: draft-carpenter-obsolete-1888-01.txt
>
> URL: ftp://ftp.rfc-editor.org/in-notes/rfc4048.txt
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------
- [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete] EricLKlein
- Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete] Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete] Bob Braden