Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete]

Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> Wed, 20 April 2005 07:26 UTC

Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DO9b9-0004v7-7I; Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:26:11 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1DNxYO-00062l-8C for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:34:32 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id OAA06244 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:34:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from boreas.isi.edu ([128.9.160.161]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1DNxjR-0000z6-8A for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 14:45:58 -0400
Received: from gra.isi.edu (gra.isi.edu [128.9.160.133]) by boreas.isi.edu (8.11.6p2+0917/8.11.2) with ESMTP id j3JIXi603886; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:44 -0700 (PDT)
From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Received: (from braden@localhost) by gra.isi.edu (8.9.3/8.8.6) id LAA02070; Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2005 11:33:43 -0700
Message-Id: <200504191833.LAA02070@gra.isi.edu>
To: EricLKlein@SoftHome.net, brc@zurich.ibm.com
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
X-ISI-4-39-6-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: braden@isi.edu
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: ffa9dfbbe7cc58b3fa6b8ae3e57b0aa3
X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 20 Apr 2005 03:26:09 -0400
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Fwd: RFC 4048 on RFC 1888 Is Obsolete]
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org


  *> 
  *> It probably should, although the title is fairly clear. 1888 now shows as
  *> Historic in the index. But its true update is presumably going to be
  *> draft-gray-rfc1888bis
  *> 
  *>     Brian
  *> 
  *> EricLKlein@SoftHome.net wrote:
  *> > This may seem a little petty, but based on the abstract and title of this
  *> > one, shouldn't the line
  *> > 
  *> >     Updates/Obsoletes/SeeAlso:    None
  *> > 
  *> > 
  *> > be changed from none to 1888?
  *> > 
  *> > Eric
  *> > 


The RFC Editor thought about this, and decided that we could not decide. ;-)
That is, one could argue either way on this.

Bob Braden

--------------------------------------------------------------------
IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
ipv6@ietf.org
Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
--------------------------------------------------------------------