IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu> Thu, 12 July 2018 18:54 UTC

Return-Path: <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBAF7130F6A for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:54:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=iol.unh.edu
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4aUd5uj3SQGj for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 485E4130E61 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id s11-v6so22716571wra.13 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:54:03 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=iol.unh.edu; s=unh-iol; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=S5CSjoOfBXrO7dhVYv/Mg+7WmqmThs5nLhzvIUR8/xA=; b=F+U51yied4Oj2Zd6FwmWeE1YAX5zqQh0IfiD1+PiO2aGeRGQSyLTOpwD3dtAK+N7uC rgQbk7ZfWUO0Roqb37RGaR+crkMp8nQK/CEa21uQAgdOOSneXx29dx/LTDRmOTsIcGcl +4br3kLg6+PzM5hP4/28Q7mCHOv42a7Z/P31o=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=S5CSjoOfBXrO7dhVYv/Mg+7WmqmThs5nLhzvIUR8/xA=; b=UsmZtJ461xzvW/H5yIquUWAydcb103SFuGf5uIJ4zULoa6ysdSMGxLwyvWIeK82TuY rJHCeYjy578JukB5nlwSeDOoAfB4ntLMzzVpy2ouvWFA2B28Z0iHJ+0V8KAyzM8QwG/h T8MN+SOlGQ7ApZqhUyf5qGCGYUavTY4GtsQmuPUCuGUkSUp1xhtk9ELtAH8UWDZ9laWc Jt1/CrSFEJh03cbnJUHtrEokLFrchauufY7fI1gDex1ZTmfQ41AHSQ1JHzxkZJ0Q3D2z QNdIee11H6ToWTTjlqfrv+CPNHXdO064+mvbwejKSkLZLolk/lMK8yyFQaQLk5QCG143 vIMA==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlESTdRJaN505/DQi8AJ1/RDhhsnBjNw7Fn+6R6PqSudNh12/aM4 1y4dnC57mDPebpteninlhjw93ZLwY3bWzGsMqbVInw==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpf36rjSqY78Yv1Gkib6s0pdcffDR7Xf6ejFFq3DsfmVaO/d6+OwQQcyjV5igSt6H8MPhQ9iAk1BVy0j9rjNhq4=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:ebc3:: with SMTP id v3-v6mr2590098wrn.33.1531421641712; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 11:54:01 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153079450932.11257.14966431811100020788.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAKD1Yr1WB+MqLwo33MAGrmohrJ-Ecy2x1Luwt==TpSzr6mqj0w@mail.gmail.com> <20180712175024.GO59001@mit.edu>
In-Reply-To: <20180712175024.GO59001@mit.edu>
From: Timothy Winters <twinters@iol.unh.edu>
Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 14:53:49 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOSSMjVKGO31pW5gvDFQb678jSiK0q2N9oyHzZXj41hJ69Seww@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: kaduk@mit.edu
Cc: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, 6man-chairs@ietf.org, 6man WG <ipv6@ietf.org>, iesg@ietf.org, draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000f4c28c0570d1e20b"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/gEH462VcVocJAUVg5WjS3-G1FC0>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 18:54:10 -0000

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 1:50 PM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 09:50:59PM -0700, Lorenzo Colitti wrote:
> > On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 05:42 Benjamin Kaduk, <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:
> >
> > > Section 15
> > >
> > >    If an IPv6 node is concerned about the impact of IPv6 message power
> > >    consumption, it SHOULD want to implement the recommendations in
> > >    [RFC7772].
> > >
> > > Do we really need to assign motive to IPv6 nodes?
> > >
> >
> > As an author of RFC 7772, I'd like to point out that the primary
> > power-saving recommendations in that document are intended for network
> > operators, not host implementations.
> >
> > I'd say the device recommendations in that document are appropriate for
> all
> > battery-powered hosts, or even all hosts in general.
>
> That seems likely for at least battery-powered hosts.  But my point is that
> the owner/operator is the entity that "is concerned" about power
> consumption -- the node itself is just going to blindly do what its
> software says, and does not have a mental process that is worrying about
> power.  That is, this is purely an editorial matter, as I see it.
>
I agree and have updated the sentence to give IPv6 Nodes motive.

New:
IPv6 nodes that are battery-powered SHOULD implement the recommendations in
[RFC7772].

>
> -Benjamin
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email