IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com> Thu, 12 July 2018 04:51 UTC

Return-Path: <lorenzo@google.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81D18130FCF for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:51:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -17.51
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-17.51 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, ENV_AND_HDR_SPF_MATCH=-0.5, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_DEF_SPF_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=google.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L6_0Mmd_Dcrt for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x42b.google.com (mail-wr1-x42b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::42b]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7CCB0130EC8 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x42b.google.com with SMTP id a3-v6so11002051wrt.2 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=i/3ynsWZUYPeGnNdgja9a7Cqu8FD76Qxep+tdukCgaI=; b=pCguUmnyuSYaFVpWE7qRFuoRfJ/G13JoOO/4xLmAGAuXFknFL5PQqJCHA3lmL9Vaa0 56pG1RI7jFR1o8yzcwdx1sN5viiU5eC42e7C1ohqF9FZK24p3uUhxBTZOzLQ06bRpEVM fUUOfdY3qpUkaZ+COyKE0wdk2uw5OcacJylf7zuuHYKCgSosSI3ZjZ2bIf2E2nr+vvSl mvDtxTdZZTlo1f9uoeALME2qJfbLMpdQ9ntQtM+ulPoJ4I7KHX7+fqT9MxyCuKH5OKfT m4C5CNEdfx3B+monYLN49ZaDfBWTTsqwWAO8ArmielUVddbJIZxoBAXTTKOW6bX/VF4O o/5g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=i/3ynsWZUYPeGnNdgja9a7Cqu8FD76Qxep+tdukCgaI=; b=Xc7zfm3IPElkJLTzW4bOTm2Ql0EPBE5w7S82nZL8MiI/I+tJklq8IAmWSFnFCk+QvP 8yKnlfRoFayYmwfu0WDkV7tjaqvmL8PxuXQVe/LAUNvAUanJt2ya2qK5vg8NCQwD9+Tl iaVqUZAF8MKU76xXoQdzvpS0CRA9/2XIm5wUItdDyIsucCvhuvU9wXK/eZK1+Ft/n+49 cGKcbnAOgz5o1Bym8mdhenUwADMGPOsvWEzJiiOoQZ96TVM1QuaWRKWMAPmw+p5exO6H RbGfo48Q5XdIyAIRVl0KOlaKgsGDErWolLz0LCiB1CuDdRzX6oxLfAchHTqYLQagkQse J4UQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGnfdV8sPywlW2GNR+owZHYd7keyWaF4tETL7SqqgX/bm/RN6qz MQWhdYK3meSxCiApAV4I7vwMvaxAt5ktMkvXfwt9Sg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpftqpQ6uo/Av7NvZD7gHcXQJjqU3ohtcij7KRS6v+QH2wMGGd2efnZKK0wQXOq55pwQj3sE+JJYHKIwmgr6n10=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e3c5:: with SMTP id k5-v6mr456152wrm.94.1531371071680; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:51:11 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <153079450932.11257.14966431811100020788.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <153079450932.11257.14966431811100020788.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
From: Lorenzo Colitti <lorenzo@google.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 21:50:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAKD1Yr1WB+MqLwo33MAGrmohrJ-Ecy2x1Luwt==TpSzr6mqj0w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis-08: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, IETF IPv6 Mailing List <ipv6@ietf.org>, bob.hinden@gmail.com, draft-ietf-6man-rfc6434-bis@ietf.org, 6man-chairs@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000bfacb40570c61cd0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/tKEaCmQmIBaxl9kFi7f8RjuYU3w>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 04:51:16 -0000

On Thu, 5 Jul 2018, 05:42 Benjamin Kaduk, <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote:

> Section 15
>
>    If an IPv6 node is concerned about the impact of IPv6 message power
>    consumption, it SHOULD want to implement the recommendations in
>    [RFC7772].
>
> Do we really need to assign motive to IPv6 nodes?
>

As an author of RFC 7772, I'd like to point out that the primary
power-saving recommendations in that document are intended for network
operators, not host implementations.

I'd say the device recommendations in that document are appropriate for all
battery-powered hosts, or even all hosts in general.

>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email