IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: draft-ietf-6man-sids-00 comments

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Mon, 16 May 2022 16:59 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1054C1D4699 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.094
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.094 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MIz7qebTMXE1 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x435.google.com (mail-wr1-x435.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::435]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 578DCC1D466D for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x435.google.com with SMTP id k30so8681763wrd.5; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=Upwjk8A7evJuIoMYHt7E8fncprWOuM03fXEjlxngGXw=; b=mOEl5Q5YPXCN9FPUwlqmztL7GeCrGXiIochYHKGbm/5f2+NnmP61VLOjgkGSrYSx+7 D3C+iXWsrqRDEDId8MqId9BoiccG/a0QblAsXIkOzTOUkm1a4AC0l1Geg4aA8bUH1xBw qA+WRhnjqdGWhfvlPWgVK6s9j/cwMhUpI/es32zhFbxUMi3I1ZLlZ2pc/6xQVOu0K2uZ cGfyLLkIwXc3rvprgL+rfkJmxAO1KroPoHLMdx3zYjaBKDxq979xb8e5O1YDZU1VDwV+ WF5L8QgiA81RoDNYjqme1CcimeBES6phn7+a96VDt4BjyW8wy7xF16CFruk08ZjyIUL7 IfPg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=Upwjk8A7evJuIoMYHt7E8fncprWOuM03fXEjlxngGXw=; b=nHoVQ4ttf+huyV+QrnLGF1tGjXeflgxtyPaqst+aOnfzeZ53e8ehVRyY3I6LPsV9WK TSxJylo0NEuVnD0fDKqRj0EvVuOzkQxoeR8cypPRhB1RYQnQ6XTWBeRkfiZtNqZpOeOb EgiBqRQQu4LTrCTqWkOhxVDGCyOHHuHzF9HdOZr8BHowFj69vq2SNN1mP3EnXzvHvqD/ 1S7J01tJOKJbv+75ue70i/lM5Doy0dAmjy2epYtUY0d2S4k+v7lbU5rh95Ezxfq4h648 EIomUzsO4HSKSg1vjgfuNTw7faMwGQrOGjIp8l1gGONKjFOYBx+1HGTD+il9G787LR9q yv2g==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533U45sopGCHAPLLIgSEbxDmPDt6og6J2OUBedmwJoeyP1UvYXnf dQgTBvyB3lrOXEq9xxDh6gY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy+9EysyDwgfiLTddZMn71cGiLwBOiNmULF59LTVrP57jim8KPxIJdYpMWgx3QDJeoDoxUW/g==
X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4bc3:0:b0:20d:4c77:9d13 with SMTP id l3-20020a5d4bc3000000b0020d4c779d13mr239708wrt.485.1652720371087; Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtpclient.apple ([2600:1700:4383:c05f:1d73:f8fd:5105:9ae3]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4-20020a05600c22c400b00397099b8cffsm3001176wmg.1.2022.05.16.09.59.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:30 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_11BA08C7-ABE4-41E3-AA71-1A25C32549E0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.80.82.1.1\))
Subject: Re: draft-ietf-6man-sids-00 comments
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAMGpriUEO3cDWmRLnMAj4A2PcBHTYmnhuChMen8GbzSnu-URVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 09:59:26 -0700
Cc: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, "Darren Dukes (ddukes)" <ddukes=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-6man-segment-routing-header@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>
Message-Id: <67674EA6-29A9-438C-9A28-86DD08E691FF@gmail.com>
References: <BL1PR11MB5366E929B42F02B041E86447C8CB9@BL1PR11MB5366.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CA+MHpBqg9he6RX3B84yS+4Q44jPX4dKZKQvJTwR64nAvFgfzTw@mail.gmail.com> <CAMGpriUEO3cDWmRLnMAj4A2PcBHTYmnhuChMen8GbzSnu-URVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.80.82.1.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/gdfsGv7tM34C28J-MtWwmHUGy2o>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2022 16:59:34 -0000

Erik,

> On May 15, 2022, at 4:49 PM, Erik Kline <ek.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> …….
> 
> We can accomplish this in one of two ways:
> 
> 1 – via errata to RFC8754, since it seems reasonable the IETF and WG new of these SIDs while RFC8754 was written. However this is probably too big for an errata?
> 
> 2 – via a new draft stating that the SRH uses Segments Left as an index into the segment list of the SRH with something like the above text.
> 
> I think this might be a bit of a stretch for an erratum but I will let the chairs and the ADs chime in.
> 
> Without too much time thinking about it, if such an erratum were filed I think I'd be inclined to mark it Technica & Verified.  I'm open to being persuaded otherwise, though.

My take is that I think it’s fine to file an errata to report the problem, but that doesn’t really fix it.  I think it would better to have a document that updates RFC8754 or a RFC8754bis.

<draft-ietf-6man-sids> could be the document that does the update.

Bob


> 
> Doing such an update to 8754 in this doc seems fine to me, erratum or no.
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email