IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-01

Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D941296E7; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:51:48 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id E1WemiL8O4hK; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pg0-x241.google.com (mail-pg0-x241.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c05::241]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CC854129690; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pg0-x241.google.com with SMTP id b1so34591022pgc.1; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hu85ECO8IQfHvEvy48R3wesZOVBnaOJefRgafTCPdaI=; b=Psv6/uTzAr19mcFa+3TbRWuDnuwGaYc/G0gS0Tbe10on9NWgpGABLBWnLg27Ur09uw BTLwqY+TmTdoE4OiGyHjVEiAc0X/pPT5xWigELei1m++RoMfOVFGQsRTV54QpNNPAPsY gDzZSl/80yC4L57n2RLsS9v0uyhfxvJHcFxjDyKvCXmjK4s6k3pR4SVqynEt5cC6rMbr FpETAs5+G5550uFpRlcPWYGQgUYiHJXFGzlbjS1mgTQMrEnVT6pnVa8cVuxNHEX6E9bF 4NxCtHQiyHR6rtE+FwyEAKy7nDkUu6RKJnlORJCaRI/15pm4Hk+HALNLht+Pi2JWp/zB Gnkg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=hu85ECO8IQfHvEvy48R3wesZOVBnaOJefRgafTCPdaI=; b=g8OMvM6qhc0dEVFGEC7E2jlJ5WMFuSH97Sd27ieTlwPF9q5uCDjam2biAN2+6OxGFL bU98tlqj8j04kRtwsDhbpwuRFKRvyn6aQiAbu8ONzlepB8L1KY2tmnsEKeKGcZktrih2 WkvHzOP4haDy7mtVk0Z0JjzolAg7X4TEziflFfy2iUlDhSK7TgqGAxjxy8VJqPWP57Q+ r1RgESN9WhARxuEzxfoH8e1bztQY45CHt26MfvPB6xFUBtPz+K5Q08+58m//SmVCOMPF 9Dj5zHfM4gTULI47+055mrQoeRWuovzfvAwO08MAy+aus+2vIfLuC+LGoyFUXY1mvRJG gOqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJ+u9lEM8rVz9PXUq3Vq0Wf00srNuq4VYLTIl2xVQsAzkM5KCqH6RiOZHX3aykvLQ==
X-Received: by 10.99.153.26 with SMTP id d26mr120073598pge.44.1483476706462; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:51:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.2] (wsip-184-191-158-59.sd.sd.cox.net. [184.191.158.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p14sm141931351pfl.74.2017.01.03.12.51.44 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:51:45 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.2 \(3259\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-01
From: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4EC5F276-BD8D-4169-82AB-F0E0225A04AE@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:51:43 -0800
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <3CB761D0-9073-4FCE-A504-AD7941606A0E@gmail.com>
References: <CACL8_9EaZ-JM-MSwzUZijAZqu12dAfA+rtHoraKcn9U3Bt7JAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xYRjWirdAdN2+-THR2d-wmama1j-HF8ANCCgZ4-zozvA@mail.gmail.com> <F38BC011-B0C0-4539-B5CC-17458EAA6989@gmail.com> <027a01d262e7$f30b30d0$d9219270$@riw.us> <9A4806E3-70B8-46E7-921D-4BA0817B16C7@gmail.com> <4EC5F276-BD8D-4169-82AB-F0E0225A04AE@gmail.com>
To: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3259)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/iCr4acdO38MiMF-oAcayceL7eRE>
Cc: Russ White <russ@riw.us>, Mohammad Moghaddas <mohammad@moghaddas.com>, draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs@tools.ietf.org, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:51:49 -0000

No argument, and BTW I tend to think most documents in both working groups benefit from cross-pollination :-)

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 12:12 PM, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Fred.
> 
>> On Jan 1, 2017, at 5:23 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 30, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Russ White <russ@riw.us> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> It is indeed an individual draft, and to my knowledge no given working
>>> group
>>>> has been asked for opinions. That said, we welcome any and all review.
>>>> Specifically, I have copied v6ops and 6man on this note.
>>> 
>>> We would like to present it to a WG as a work item--which WG would be best
>>> for this one? There are some sections that need to be filled before we
>>> present it, I think.
>>> 
>>> :-)
>>> 
>>> Russ
>> 
>> Personaly opinion: this isn’t about IPv6 per se, it is about the operation of an IPv6 network. I’d suggest v6ops.
> 
> Probably good to keep both w.g.’s involved.  I was thinking this was similar to IPv6 Node Requirements which in in 6MAN.
> 
> Also, 6MAN has started on an Node Requirements bis document, good to keep this coordinated with that.
> 
> Bob
> 
> 
> 
>> 
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
>> ipv6@ietf.org
>> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email