IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-01

Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com> Tue, 03 January 2017 20:13 UTC

Return-Path: <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED37C129B70; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:13:03 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id BxwRFdu8wsHK; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4F868129B4B; Tue, 3 Jan 2017 12:13:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id u25so51316007qki.2; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:13:02 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to; bh=ftJxlfpXa51Y0RON3WGo9YWQmzSzpfhFQllJ16aCcOs=; b=ZgfnkYlEEw95Dk504ye4omQWpewN6Ye2ftJMDS1MWPrnlezcZPtBbg8/5iAV01rAeL H52CXAcbdjbHHgsxiT0r258X+wxtchwnSv2ZyKAI6ODdAUZt0pdsrmgr352Yz+CGZ3mo u0ApUT0nc3MgS1epgHJ7AkLOjJqzPd9i9y7mH/tgppfUqm9wzodIcoKFRb238WxSGnQF dgKUh2BVY29kA5vkBeQG6yPGIYhdrY1O/23PbmUYemfL23J/+WN/O8MeuhNwrv1cLYnI p05xVQyFoeAWkYgxZFA8tSqeMDa/qcN2XEYjdqL7Ra/s0iOu+fHM/mvqh7w6R8l4RNwt 8AEg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to; bh=ftJxlfpXa51Y0RON3WGo9YWQmzSzpfhFQllJ16aCcOs=; b=RfgSWLr1wCeV38s5I9FdG9WwYY9T1my9rhXaSIRbTI5u+3VuMKntB5+8uohDH/Csdo oRxu7s3EqIOFnzqbQzVVDtD/M/uDYQ376RpLlFSWA7xAk3b/Euq/WuzcK57AYUukDHnQ Msk3ZrduWWYfUo0i7vWmC3Mq8diOKhEzH5i0CrC6O8ixy6CVkDrR1IAQ8hkMMfHCOfWg WRuKcSLMFcZL3RE0c/5rZHS8UJb8GnCEzIF62DXFUFTfVEgEQkABNKAZeW0aTiByUpEu BTPaw0RZ8viUoWqIKYfYtEgejcUA5wG6Tdq5ClepgyYYFFrNu7d5T3kp2ZlbdxsRBoGz ZVuQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXKd7bxrYXnzZKHjC6cAuAwuGoy7FdyfPgU7xtWEJTJnWU0IZZ3RISw6ntvkb9Qmuw==
X-Received: by 10.55.169.21 with SMTP id s21mr62407957qke.246.1483474381479; Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:13:01 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [172.16.224.219] ([209.97.127.34]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a81sm44353713qkg.28.2017.01.03.12.12.59 (version=TLS1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:13:00 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_92DA8041-F632-487F-A88B-CC6D95AD36D1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Comments on draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs-01
From: Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <9A4806E3-70B8-46E7-921D-4BA0817B16C7@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 12:12:57 -0800
Message-Id: <4EC5F276-BD8D-4169-82AB-F0E0225A04AE@gmail.com>
References: <CACL8_9EaZ-JM-MSwzUZijAZqu12dAfA+rtHoraKcn9U3Bt7JAA@mail.gmail.com> <CAO42Z2xYRjWirdAdN2+-THR2d-wmama1j-HF8ANCCgZ4-zozvA@mail.gmail.com> <F38BC011-B0C0-4539-B5CC-17458EAA6989@gmail.com> <027a01d262e7$f30b30d0$d9219270$@riw.us> <9A4806E3-70B8-46E7-921D-4BA0817B16C7@gmail.com>
To: Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xQDHA4aGhU8RFFRUp57cVaUah7g>
Cc: v6ops list <v6ops@ietf.org>, IPv6 List <ipv6@ietf.org>, Russ White <russ@riw.us>, Mohammad Moghaddas <mohammad@moghaddas.com>, draft-ali-ipv6rtr-reqs@tools.ietf.org, Bob Hinden <bob.hinden@gmail.com>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Jan 2017 20:13:04 -0000

Fred.

> On Jan 1, 2017, at 5:23 PM, Fred Baker <fredbaker.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 30, 2016, at 1:59 PM, Russ White <russ@riw.us> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> It is indeed an individual draft, and to my knowledge no given working
>> group
>>> has been asked for opinions. That said, we welcome any and all review.
>>> Specifically, I have copied v6ops and 6man on this note.
>> 
>> We would like to present it to a WG as a work item--which WG would be best
>> for this one? There are some sections that need to be filled before we
>> present it, I think.
>> 
>> :-)
>> 
>> Russ
> 
> Personaly opinion: this isn’t about IPv6 per se, it is about the operation of an IPv6 network. I’d suggest v6ops.

Probably good to keep both w.g.’s involved.  I was thinking this was similar to IPv6 Node Requirements which in in 6MAN.

Also, 6MAN has started on an Node Requirements bis document, good to keep this coordinated with that.

Bob



> 
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email