IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Source Address Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Sat, 31 January 2015 09:17 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 669E21A88FC for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:17:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tzH4IHcQ4OnU for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:17:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alln-iport-7.cisco.com (alln-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.142.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6C4801A88EF for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 01:17:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1562; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1422695854; x=1423905454; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=pP5y7cL8xSfrb8EgapByLBjRBlGklZLxBZvsvHaXDFk=; b=TwpABYWb4uR6PKGf40o02JE64j0JmH3/vEyrQI1KRa3QrUNDXRYE6X8J MAFwPk7pexNt/+CKJon7RLcmFHCQQdhYLYefs7RKkmN11E2x/jsCEsJvd A4ECbKDKCkedRgq8eQTzzBE+gEJ6vErq3u/owN3EorntTsqszeLel8TQX s=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0A8BQB4nMxU/4gNJK1bgwZSWQTEbYVvAoEUQwEBAQEBfYQMAQEBAwF5BQsCAQgYLiERJQIEDgUOiAoDCQgNzSENhVIBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQETBI1OgioHgxaBEwWPAYFUgStPhBGBRoxfhXwig25vAYFDfgEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.09,496,1418083200"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="119286118"
Received: from alln-core-3.cisco.com ([173.36.13.136]) by alln-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 31 Jan 2015 09:17:33 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com [173.37.183.83]) by alln-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t0V9HXdq021849 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:17:33 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.211]) by xhc-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([173.37.183.83]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 03:17:33 -0600
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Source Address Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6
Thread-Topic: Source Address Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6
Thread-Index: AQHQNcNADOrV3CAXwEuZ9Jr9dnzyvJzLywmAgAB6KgCAAjxiAIACkjOAgAObTACAAHVVgIAAOywAgAA9xACAAoJmAIAAZtyAgAAu9wCAAAM1gIABCOkAgAAtgICAAFRWAIAAIwIA
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:17:33 +0000
Message-ID: <4AFCD303-8D20-440D-AAA4-6A26C25F6996@cisco.com>
References: <CAC8QAcdfLPW5-GZFo-eFZY=wXXzTgvNpKG_MgARGkb48HtPQsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0-64qTy7pSB0y0faJNJNb_epgm4BmrkULBuPPCZ5bmTA@mail.gmail.com> <50BA595E-F4D4-4BAD-BCCA-418A0857FA16@darou.fr> <CAC8QAcciYVb5xOPzR11keckimb3imtzNwkea7nSOGvYh7=c0kQ@mail.gmail.com> <1F17C514-D466-4069-9D1E-9EE15E59995F@darou.fr> <CAC8QAceabpe+bHPyQD7fJCXzS-kh17ESw-zoax_pJSKhbmz4Dw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0waXtgp3g2gcH64ygQ3zE_ktfi3mA+2tqpUYtAXujOzg@mail.gmail.com> <54C86618.4070505@gmail.com> <323EF2A4-9200-4382-953F-752ABBE29126@employees.org> <CAC8QAcfWAKWDwr9vxw-F04rrZA8cHbrpWdxfh1tJ52VTigL1WA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0-pQffp=0HLA2MaFaoUdiTLSPn6TqVkU2k8K3qcQUBxw@mail.gmail.com> <54CB3278.8040001@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0pOVWFJdT+yZMshAA6g1dh0UrG=P+Dd1RcA4t05zSxuQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAce9TSkiLBjrnG4eGAZe2SC6HS2Qtqm84qOn3+=QqNUyYw@mail.gmail.com> <4FC68E66-37E0-483F-B12E-EDFAE169FD83@cisco.com> <54CC804C.5000204@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <54CC804C.5000204@gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.121]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_16223EFD-9F83-43D2-A607-4F09FE4DEF5C"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/iZhD7QKY10hkn7S2ZrMU97FJ0Kc>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 09:17:36 -0000

> On Jan 30, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> I think that's a fair question, once we know we have a routing problem.
> It seems to me that isn't clear yet, which is why I'd like to see
> something approaching consenus about the scenario analysis.

Well, in case it helps:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases
  "Requirements and Use Cases for Source/Destination Routing", Fred Baker,
  2014-10-21

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email