Re: Source Address Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Sat, 31 January 2015 18:25 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95F9B1A1A8F for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:25:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 55q8jzLjpq4k for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 272901A0103 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:25:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pa0-f53.google.com with SMTP id kx10so65096789pab.12 for <6man@ietf.org>; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:25:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9SzgcB8xPLAXWUAoiRnWTUL2RqrCblwbv4KYfN3Q2rs=; b=MHVrLXdBRMNeQc79LeVs7zyluprFaU8VmzADOtyX+tUL3n0g0CmFulTR58JpRkkRDD UOoLrQV+KCdT2owjNtmUAtR/rMvO+u05pIkfo9t7oyFbF9dxqScaWgat7FFATRyMxijr AaK8uJahnXW//M8PARB/W06dB/P3VAL/0EYfU8GaIqhaC/GMxFTII+OlTITk0UURjSrj zGitPDG0frc9KgKItQKpo+h/2Yc0nd/TcBebR8H80LUaw8kRGzE+dQ8PcCTtcZRNfi+p lFjXhVj7wys3cDfA1gC3SX965py7qOJuaYb426r3Y5/PPhqBr1fS2vVFP87KzFYj7bT6 yQQA==
X-Received: by 10.66.250.225 with SMTP id zf1mr17963984pac.31.1422728742464; Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:25:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.1.67] (210-86-2-198.adsl.xtra.co.nz. [210.86.2.198]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id in1sm14293747pbc.19.2015.01.31.10.25.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 31 Jan 2015 10:25:41 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <54CD1E1A.4070303@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Feb 2015 07:25:30 +1300
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.4.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: Source Address Dependent Routing and Source Address Selection for IPv6
References: <CAC8QAcdfLPW5-GZFo-eFZY=wXXzTgvNpKG_MgARGkb48HtPQsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0-64qTy7pSB0y0faJNJNb_epgm4BmrkULBuPPCZ5bmTA@mail.gmail.com> <50BA595E-F4D4-4BAD-BCCA-418A0857FA16@darou.fr> <CAC8QAcciYVb5xOPzR11keckimb3imtzNwkea7nSOGvYh7=c0kQ@mail.gmail.com> <1F17C514-D466-4069-9D1E-9EE15E59995F@darou.fr> <CAC8QAceabpe+bHPyQD7fJCXzS-kh17ESw-zoax_pJSKhbmz4Dw@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0waXtgp3g2gcH64ygQ3zE_ktfi3mA+2tqpUYtAXujOzg@mail.gmail.com> <54C86618.4070505@gmail.com> <323EF2A4-9200-4382-953F-752ABBE29126@employees.org> <CAC8QAcfWAKWDwr9vxw-F04rrZA8cHbrpWdxfh1tJ52VTigL1WA@mail.gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0-pQffp=0HLA2MaFaoUdiTLSPn6TqVkU2k8K3qcQUBxw@mail.gmail.com> <54CB3278.8040001@gmail.com> <CAKD1Yr0pOVWFJdT+yZMshAA6g1dh0UrG=P+Dd1RcA4t05zSxuQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAC8QAce9TSkiLBjrnG4eGAZe2SC6HS2Qtqm84qOn3+=QqNUyYw@mail.gmail.com> <4FC68E66-37E0-483F-B12E-EDFAE169FD83@cisco.com> <54CC804C.5000204@gmail.com> <4AFCD303-8D20-440D-AAA4-6A26C25F6996@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AFCD303-8D20-440D-AAA4-6A26C25F6996@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/xUN0F1dFVI9_ctmctYK51Jzn3-0>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2015 18:25:44 -0000

On 31/01/2015 22:17, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
> 
>> On Jan 30, 2015, at 11:12 PM, Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I think that's a fair question, once we know we have a routing problem.
>> It seems to me that isn't clear yet, which is why I'd like to see
>> something approaching consenus about the scenario analysis.
> 
> Well, in case it helps:
> 
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases
>   "Requirements and Use Cases for Source/Destination Routing", Fred Baker,
>   2014-10-21

IMHO they do help and Behcet's draft specifically refers to them, but the
concern is about what should be shipped in all host stacks such that all
hosts will work in any of the possible scenarios.

   Brian

    Brian