IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function

Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net> Thu, 05 September 2019 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <robert@raszuk.net>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43E8E120105 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 02:36:00 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=raszuk.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MjJt0gh3FVSP for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 02:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qt1-x833.google.com (mail-qt1-x833.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::833]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9786112002F for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Sep 2019 02:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qt1-x833.google.com with SMTP id n7so2000574qtb.6 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 02:35:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=raszuk.net; s=google; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=nI9MHlrvXbtupq+LiSU7kXoL9bPAH61BzMYA79PQGtU=; b=d9NozgICxeQDDGCVVBhBGY0dLO5mfDRflQzHIwxvMu76n8E/U6jEjC9V5xOmlAc5fI 2EWHl/xGXLD0/GCmBpTigyqKbC93r0sicuaCj1YWC6UzbvVLH2L8HLPiADgMgzU2aN01 hf0/AYgezulptHmMQ0xNZwoKR4ZhQ3u2unbUGHeOMysVkcnXNwzNANhJVDro+iWFQCTk p3cxok5B1zEyE7FFfeJm33nAUW8Pjuu+MJLiBhri4/KAG6n6eEztX6h3EP9bXlJfaDef 1W6owQaGI3a4YmxWLUMcrhws8CxcU9f5707MgQ+AWx9ejpXXDpmCtnxcPs0/pOOIefpc MLAg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=nI9MHlrvXbtupq+LiSU7kXoL9bPAH61BzMYA79PQGtU=; b=J29jxvI4oB4Z6G2zq3y2XwUaMw8/fJorXpKAGGmK+mAS7Mq+MI5m4dm4kmSfa3VFiY kPbfQsEcLHe12BK0d2TZeOuDUtOhMxVMxpzEVwrkpVYgidIZTRb3Qj1cMWXWdw7GjDyw F0GQhZH543zsyM/QYHa0Qk8sP9qJhlHGd8+BaxY20LlP2u7f1HEwPUb/3SltKJd/w+C5 0+v26H/yPh9MZnDTjEBYKyIzZBIBmaiZagTM8ed6UHl7vOBgYgmzv2oflel/CV/6n40R Jt9MVgo+RR8Q5kjHSS3Jq7Kzc37jiLK1vwPBYD+kv7X0vCmORFkfvDcpYgNfGltUB4Xl AHCw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVIiPLcbjBW2uASohM46KREZpeezXJ61ryxEgZ8rAK8z6pDD3dz XT+40bMeo3i32Y7bgtpGTr8dFSy8LJdZZoCOQbJGAg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyeWJgNUsIb5lhTC/4g8Xdl/aNwzdfSiJqlKuvwCBLLZRP1LmB3qJjiecEEKWMx0hqoAl3uxNqAt/qS2Sj5jEU=
X-Received: by 2002:a0c:9082:: with SMTP id p2mr1055275qvp.197.1567676156370; Thu, 05 Sep 2019 02:35:56 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <HK0PR03MB3970C6DCC635E7CD802D65FDFCBD0@HK0PR03MB3970.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com> <BYAPR05MB54636A2332FED916A26A6F14AEBD0@BYAPR05MB5463.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <3e31873a-278a-2154-0e71-4d820bba323d@gont.com.ar> <4012D854-2F10-4476-951D-FFFE73C5083C@gmail.com> <cb2f56f8-acdc-d68d-0878-9609cb3d7b1b@gont.com.ar> <18D85493-5FD4-4D26-B1A1-0931513DC847@gmail.com> <05b6474b-ecc2-fbf9-ac5e-d81157be8b90@gont.com.ar> <537C92D5-7355-45B5-8974-C74ED08B0E0F@employees.org> <a7b5255b-8570-0e4b-da17-7557e7ca18c1@si6networks.com> <CAOj+MMGbu5DhZ+igBLnU5M3QA5wFqzg=fiZG_Mhgnt-d0MG7yA@mail.gmail.com> <AM0PR03MB3828138B0D728AA6FC4FA4139DBB0@AM0PR03MB3828.eurprd03.prod.outlook.com> <CAOj+MMG=JLBb6X7HSYkhdPStCxvONUu6DJeCfW1dYVvZqSRKhA@mail.gmail.com> <HK0PR03MB3970B55C202EBD4B17A4F1C0FCBB0@HK0PR03MB3970.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <HK0PR03MB3970B55C202EBD4B17A4F1C0FCBB0@HK0PR03MB3970.apcprd03.prod.outlook.com>
From: Robert Raszuk <robert@raszuk.net>
Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 11:35:45 +0200
Message-ID: <CAOj+MME+Awisr44KoUiGqpSm31kmC_VJZmA1z_Yv6FeEz4YL4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Re: [spring] Question about SRv6 Insert function
To: li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
Cc: Alexander Vainshtein <Alexander.Vainshtein@ecitele.com>, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "spring@ietf.org" <spring@ietf.org>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>, draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion <draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion@ietf.org>, Suresh Krishnan <suresh.krishnan@gmail.com>, Fernando Gont <fgont@si6networks.com>, draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming <draft-ietf-spring-srv6-network-programming@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c7a5e0591cb0cfc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/n5pIImK0nrBu2smsw_-gWQfKGbI>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Sep 2019 09:36:00 -0000

Hi,

Ok but this extra insertion is just one of possible SR applications and has
no bearing on SRv6 architecture and all other SRv6 documents running via
various stages of IETF process like number of folks are voicing on the list
just to mud the waters.

There is valid problem statement presented in
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-voyer-6man-extension-header-insertion-06 and
if approved and processed via IETF it will update RFC8200.

If IETF decides that FRR is not needed for IPv6 packets that is fine. If WG
decides that this use case is valid but for IPv6 purity requires new EH
type I guess authors will take that feedback and discuss internally.

Cheers
Robert.


On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 11:22 AM li zhenqiang <li_zhenqiang@hotmail.com>
wrote:

> Dear Robert,
>
> Yes, SRH is TLV based. But the two documents want to insert one more SRH
> in a packet, not more segments in one SRH.
>
> I recommend nothing. Just post the question.
>
> Best Regards,
> Zhenqiang Li
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email