Re: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-06.txt

Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com> Fri, 10 April 2015 06:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ot@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83A2A1ACE67 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:15:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.511
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.511 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id T560g-aelklP for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:15:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from aer-iport-2.cisco.com (aer-iport-2.cisco.com [173.38.203.52]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B212B1ACE65 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 23:15:47 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1499; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428646547; x=1429856147; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to; bh=P4RfvStorqrrvpEsujWB5KD5dfQNiWNqUYbyt72Xmcs=; b=F0cMJuDrT9Cedq7a8X5e2Ed3mLLhuX7Y1S8ZH2QIcZBU2HACaaJR6AK9 oRPiZJhJZ4hJ2zPQJK0TnpvaWdWR9Bl5liF8eSE82Xx++6IsqHYWoc1al W0kTdT0YCke7hFn5HMurQ7tCbbT8wgWXAzNsXxnZcz2dczcJhdYXBwbeQ E=;
X-Files: signature.asc : 496
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0D5AwBfaSdV/xbLJq1cgmaEacE5CYdPAoF+FAEBAQEBAQF9hCABAQQjVAIQC0ICAlcGiD0Bt2WWVQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAReLK4R8B4JoL4EWAQSScYgelGUig3GDMAEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,555,1422921600"; d="asc'?scan'208";a="424443569"
Received: from aer-iport-nat.cisco.com (HELO aer-core-3.cisco.com) ([173.38.203.22]) by aer-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 10 Apr 2015 06:15:46 +0000
Received: from gomlefisk.localdomain (ssh-ams-2.cisco.com [144.254.73.146]) by aer-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t3A6Fjbd031764 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 10 Apr 2015 06:15:45 GMT
Received: from [IPv6:::1] (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by gomlefisk.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 958D94292149; Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:15:47 +0200 (CEST)
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-06.txt
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2098\))
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_D050FF68-02FA-48AE-B274-09CD54AA590A"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha512"
X-Pgp-Agent: GPGMail 2.5b6
From: Ole Troan <ot@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5526E648.4020004@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:15:46 +0200
Message-Id: <F48F50DA-4257-48E7-B34D-A0543EA3E50D@cisco.com>
References: <CAC8QAceCoBx8VCgLq5tJ8JUGtVCPP+PXC0gxmhpRpmrp0MXqPw@mail.gmail.com> <55240885.9060200@globis.net> <CAC8QAcddWTb-w_3Q29sq0GpUOcqyOPjDRd1a0Uk3zY0ivzohNg@mail.gmail.com> <5526E648.4020004@gmail.com>
To: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2098)
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/oKVpcdFpLIZMMlr4VxtwctAkCVs>
Cc: Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>, "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 06:15:49 -0000

> ...
>>> But I'd expect any "SADR overview" to also cover router - router forwarding
>>> behaviour. Not just end host - router.
>> 
>> Can you offer some text?
> 
> At the moment that's covered by draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases.
> IMHO the separation into host and router drafts is reasonable, so that
> each draft fits mainly into a single WG.

fully agree. SADR might not be the best name for the host portion.
perhaps something like "IPv6 Multi-homed host gaps”?

Ole