Re: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-06.txt

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 09 April 2015 20:51 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 127481B3261 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:51:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e6eu_Rz5L2-v for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:51:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x22c.google.com (mail-pa0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 501141B324F for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Apr 2015 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pabtp1 with SMTP id tp1so55463885pab.2 for <6man@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc :subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=CXFGn68pV7g2QMj6IkqF77u5diJjN3ad2fIyR5KtgLE=; b=dw43/lKRqC8Q56W7YPpL+ezo31A9BhzN1VvJeeinAklIe0H9+kkqcnzPK2JMx6tPo8 bPzszOnTsJ0wbJoNy2Cxx2ZoIpPL+IfdOmjVj2/Cb/gbr3cdXOTapN/VTdwxEbEPNabh aWUzPIR88WAOy4vre7RkrhE/YDlIAghIy/AiRRz3X0+IMSeWx7/WrFhDG23gB7NjxmSF hc4IwmTIWrm/HGGrbVjrvYQCl/xRQuELD8ObT5PgrqZKMeFVZOFiCqar1Egk/FNCnI17 Vv9TL2Q9yRMqO3hm4xeXzXHSJRYlV5fypPGp/SqT+1ccXjfgpUoI/DHw4vbidjaTifi1 JP/Q==
X-Received: by 10.70.5.225 with SMTP id v1mr59220400pdv.103.1428612676045; Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:51:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e007:65de:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781? ([2406:e007:65de:1:28cc:dc4c:9703:6781]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id fs16sm10168643pdb.12.2015.04.09.13.51.12 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2015 13:51:14 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <5526E648.4020004@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Apr 2015 08:51:20 +1200
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sarikaya@ieee.org, Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net>
Subject: Re: New Version Notification for draft-sarikaya-6man-sadr-overview-06.txt
References: <CAC8QAceCoBx8VCgLq5tJ8JUGtVCPP+PXC0gxmhpRpmrp0MXqPw@mail.gmail.com> <55240885.9060200@globis.net> <CAC8QAcddWTb-w_3Q29sq0GpUOcqyOPjDRd1a0Uk3zY0ivzohNg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcddWTb-w_3Q29sq0GpUOcqyOPjDRd1a0Uk3zY0ivzohNg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/vO8hDalQ6mcljBVDYpzG13IG11w>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Apr 2015 20:51:21 -0000

On 08/04/2015 05:02, Behcet Sarikaya wrote:
> Hi Ray,
> 
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Ray Hunter <v6ops@globis.net> wrote:

...
>> But I'd expect any "SADR overview" to also cover router - router forwarding
>> behaviour. Not just end host - router.
> 
> Can you offer some text?

At the moment that's covered by draft-baker-rtgwg-src-dst-routing-use-cases.
IMHO the separation into host and router drafts is reasonable, so that
each draft fits mainly into a single WG.

    Brian