Re: draft-wang-6man-flow-label-reflection

Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch> Sat, 15 November 2014 02:51 UTC

Return-Path: <jeroen@massar.ch>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9EE0C1A19ED for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:51:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id wsnUEUbdR4cq for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from bastion.ch.unfix.org (bastion.ch.unfix.org [46.20.246.101]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 72C7D1A0B76 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 Nov 2014 18:51:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from kami.ch.unfix.org (kami.ch.unfix.org [IPv6:2001:1620:f42:99:7256:81ff:fea5:2925]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: jeroen) by bastion.ch.unfix.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 784C910090761; Sat, 15 Nov 2014 02:51:30 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=massar.ch; s=DKIM2009; t=1416019890; bh=dVpRXPdYWFXipSuhJ5xP00rLSZnv+MXhQDq8vGVzYUY=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To; b=qf/rVUwyRejvFnbMAQpg/PdRicmGrIRNchbFMF6jlK0EN3EvGWDPqpacfU6+PEXE7 3RGnO1bgZ2no7CtfWjkhWHOAHGDtuanfhxbakF5FtynL7+z0gjLnrc0fPgQiJyQFK6 nowYUyTqkijMn/N0lG8zKf0XD/YBSqICb55KznmgXXuvLCI6G4hM8/PSFpmLlvQ6Sx eNlB/83IhCOpbP4W0C9mAOA/pM9Cpb+mEABwAJcoOseYVlypwvh7lH7FzB5TYvfi1O Yutj1IsYrPNvSILe9NFURupm5LbyGtamsPiP6Lo5+H8qfFQhYOWzP4tijErURbVLLI bMrE2srBPur2Q==
Message-ID: <5466BFB0.303@massar.ch>
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 03:51:28 +0100
From: Jeroen Massar <jeroen@massar.ch>
Organization: Massar
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Aijun Wang <wangaijun@tsinghua.org.cn>, 'Sheng Jiang' <jiangsheng@huawei.com>, '6man WG' <ipv6@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: draft-wang-6man-flow-label-reflection
References: <5465C0AC.10801@massar.ch> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AF75421@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com>, <546681A0.9070703@massar.ch> <5D36713D8A4E7348A7E10DF7437A4B923AF75695@nkgeml512-mbx.china.huawei.com> <5466928E.6070800@massar.ch> <008801d00070$580df030$0829d090$@org.cn>
In-Reply-To: <008801d00070$580df030$0829d090$@org.cn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/qsf054Gb1YvIjGfefJZic5fGTac
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 02:51:34 -0000

On 2014-11-15 02:05, Aijun Wang wrote:
> Hi, Jeroen:
> 
> Service Provider wants to apply the same policy to the upstream and
> downstream of one session, or more accurately, apply the policy to
> downstream of one session based on the recognition of it upstream packet.
>
> The flow label can be used to identify the unique session between one pair
> of IPv6 hosts, and alleviate the burden for the network device to recognize
> the downstream packet, for example, http response packet. We think this is
> one appropriate use case for the flow label.

The Flow Label as defined tells you nothing about the contents of the
flow. Hence nothing to prioritise on there. You will still have to look
at the typical five tuple and likely deeper when everything is just
going to look like HTTP.

Oh, and IPv6 Errors (ICMPv6) are part of that flow, but the Flow Label
will not include those.

And as you say "Service Provider" though, sounds like you are opening
that can of worms called Net Neutrality.

Greets,
 Jeroen