Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question
itojun@itojun.org (Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino) Wed, 02 February 2005 01:06 UTC
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA25537 for <ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:06:44 -0500 (EST)
Received: from megatron.ietf.org ([132.151.6.71]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cw9H1-0006hN-Vb for ipv6-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:25:40 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=megatron.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cw8xy-0004Zy-Dc; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:05:58 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.32) id 1Cw8wc-0004NS-HW for ipv6@megatron.ietf.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:04:34 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx.ietf.org (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id UAA25400 for <ipv6@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Feb 2005 20:04:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from coconut.itojun.org ([221.249.121.227]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cw9Em-0006eE-O7 for ipv6@ietf.org; Tue, 01 Feb 2005 20:23:26 -0500
Received: by coconut.itojun.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 01FC51C063; Wed, 2 Feb 2005 10:04:12 +0900 (JST)
To: bob.hinden@nokia.com
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 31 Jan 2005 04:48:36 -0800" <6.1.2.0.2.20050131043340.02fbf0c0@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com>
References: <6.1.2.0.2.20050131043340.02fbf0c0@mailhost.iprg.nokia.com>
X-Mailer: Cue version 0.8 (050118-1752/itojun)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="us-ascii"
Message-Id: <20050202010412.01FC51C063@coconut.itojun.org>
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2005 10:04:12 +0900
From: itojun@itojun.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: 9466e0365fc95844abaf7c3f15a05c7d
Cc: ipv6@ietf.org
Subject: Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IP Version 6 Working Group \(ipv6\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
Errors-To: ipv6-bounces@ietf.org
X-Spam-Score: 0.1 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: bb8f917bb6b8da28fc948aeffb74aa17
> I am working on an update to the IPv6 address architecture. In doing this > I am working through the comments on the previous draft. One comment made > was to remove Section 2.5.5 "IPv6 Addresses with Embedded IPv4 Addresses" > from the document. This would include removing the special case in the > textual representation (section 2.2, 3.). > > I would like to solicit the working group's thoughts on this. I don't have > a strong opinion one way or another. It's not clear it has ever been that > useful and add a certain degree of complexity. On the other hand, it > appears in several places in the document and requires some careful > editing :-) > > Since I expect this is widely implemented, please be sure to report any > problem that might occur if this is to be removed from the > specification. This includes would it break other documents that refer to > the IPv6 address architecture specification. > > The plan is to submit the updated draft for Draft Standard. In general > removing things that are not found to be useful is OK when going to Draft > standard. I support the removal of section 2.5.5 and section 2.2(3). IPv4 compatible address is not used any more as auto tunnel went away. my position on IPv4 mapped address is described in the following documents: draft-cmetz-v6ops-v4mapped-api-harmful-01.txt draft-itojun-v6ops-v4mapped-harmful-02.txt itojun -------------------------------------------------------------------- IETF IPv6 working group mailing list ipv6@ietf.org Administrative Requests: https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6 --------------------------------------------------------------------
- IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bob Hinden
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bob Hinden
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bill Sommerfeld
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Markku Savela
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Manfredi, Albert E
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question sasson, shuki
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Pekka Savola
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Antonio Querubin
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bob Hinden
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Markku Savela
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Juergen Schoenwaelder
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Colm MacCarthaigh
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question sasson, shuki
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Pekka Savola
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Juergen Schoenwaelder
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bound, Jim
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Christian Weisgerber
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Antonio Querubin
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Mark Andrews
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Alan Chang
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Soohong Daniel Park
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Radhakrishnan Suryanarayanan
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bound, Jim
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bob Hinden
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bound, Jim
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Colm MacCarthaigh
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bound, Jim
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bound, Jim
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Tim Chown
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Markku Savela
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Francis Dupont
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeroen Massar
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Tony Hain
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Tim Hartrick
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Francis Dupont
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Jeff W. Boote
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Pekka Savola
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Christian Weisgerber
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Fred L. Templin
- Re: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Bob Hinden
- RE: IPv6 Address Architecture update question Fred L. Templin