IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [IPv6] 4-in-1

Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com> Mon, 19 June 2023 15:11 UTC

Return-Path: <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A171AC152573 for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:11:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.844
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.844 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Xfj5j63STBeK for <ipv6@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com (mail-wr1-x429.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::429]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CA284C15257D for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id ffacd0b85a97d-30fcde6a73cso3004849f8f.2 for <6man@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:11:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1687187469; x=1689779469; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=tvEJB/KY7RCxEUpDhprpMjuVcNYv2tMuch9rxVIDWjI=; b=SyO93EHb4ytvQcuj4+aFkFb+dq9yR64GqCjYUjtqUuNYfbJdA3OFilxLTAVnStx5qy 3H39VR1jceuwg+B29mOpqkBzBcxXuKpHKTNMDZPmYlbYNE6Lu9ZBBzvKyyVoCLkv91p4 G5+4PKkSCmdnis2+1R6HZUVHCU4WNTkEhiWHtc+g84tX9ClDojIqm385TD/oI08kSGqL ItJvPE1tLLR1ycolOGL31z0iWr7JRnv3RRl2fyW5RzGtHCrPMCuFTNbCjWc3xi8+6xVd AUd2TjokDoBioYdM7+zx2CWI4gGaU4GwTgwtcEyBRgQI8g+ckeqZMtxFkUWZdlczLv0V WGsw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1687187469; x=1689779469; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:reply-to:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=tvEJB/KY7RCxEUpDhprpMjuVcNYv2tMuch9rxVIDWjI=; b=Qsgtxc4ojOvA3Vn64c1MV5h5m9gQONKPu8DY+NZHM7fSTfz36ofkk4/+riAeEJAlQ7 NCN3QdrAuNF1fdUfnBy2BQ7l4Ky1R8LTXdZCZ1Qox1KJD8ZDZE3lU+GLx7VRxjLF6yyZ jdcmLxJlnPhaI3fGmE0ME5C/qcsf1ss2QBHAHANrZMOUF+wn6/OreWm612LampzweSl8 Bxh9IamgSHCXDFCu7USM8zVFgek42pzE3xMqbSWCdpgxCBkLtM3ag3Qr+PZTYkeWcPhk wGb3Sh6JHrGLBPzn6bD/SdvRayE2r0W4tVs77oaIO4cnsWtD3fnbTQTDN+pbkh+Dh/4C hbUQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDwFUO2y5nWNGLoSWTaNWK0gVwfD+CUBK0Qh2Ed9ky0jKw+g1xIL +LPhGILl57tWQD+iRgFXAWtke26hDsg8tqCBPPE4E4FjjEI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ6/g1AZ4HC7mfhe+Ss7FLSAYsL4e9PtJBCeHLSnO8BRXcgUCwbq4qXZAAua3f5bpnp4EcWT6EROOv0YE5wBZd8=
X-Received: by 2002:adf:e447:0:b0:30f:b6f9:de28 with SMTP id t7-20020adfe447000000b0030fb6f9de28mr6629757wrm.21.1687187468478; Mon, 19 Jun 2023 08:11:08 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CO1PR11MB4881F102CBE59665CB11D336D858A@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com> <CAC8QAcfuxb4-Wsj0T1=+EWYATU=P8JJwSj+BoxeW-V6GthB3QA@mail.gmail.com> <CO1PR11MB4881CACC20CFBB2B97FBD0BDD858A@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
In-Reply-To: <CO1PR11MB4881CACC20CFBB2B97FBD0BDD858A@CO1PR11MB4881.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
Reply-To: sarikaya@ieee.org
From: Behcet Sarikaya <sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 10:10:55 -0500
Message-ID: <CAC8QAccSn750OdOa=FuJZn6EYBCuvGMMe_-vX2Ztn8Nx=mFbkw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
Cc: "6man@ietf.org" <6man@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ba6c3d05fe7cf10c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/ipv6/zIRcsVWj98pTB5lZ1RPw68WORU0>
Subject: Re: [IPv6] 4-in-1
X-BeenThere: ipv6@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IPv6 Maintenance Working Group \(6man\)" <ipv6.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/ipv6/>
List-Post: <mailto:ipv6@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6>, <mailto:ipv6-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2023 15:11:14 -0000

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:14 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <
pthubert@cisco.com> wrote:

> Hello Behcet:
>
> could you please provide an example to illustrate your meaning?
>
>

It's not only me, Brian and Lorenzo said similar things.

Behcet

> regards,
>
> Pascal
> ------------------------------
> *De :* ipv6 <ipv6-bounces@ietf.org> de la part de Behcet Sarikaya <
> sarikaya2012@gmail.com>
> *Envoyé :* vendredi 16 juin 2023 17:41
> *À :* Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org>
> *Cc :* 6man@ietf.org <6man@ietf.org>
> *Objet :* Re: [IPv6] 4-in-1
>
> Hi Pascal,
>
> It think the main comment on your draft was that the language, the model
> used was based on IEEE's link model from the 1970s, etc. used was archaic.
> I don't think that can be fixed with a minor revision.
>
> Behcet
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 10:24 AM Pascal Thubert (pthubert) <pthubert=
> 40cisco.com@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote:
>
> Dear all:
>
> I republished draft-ietf-6man-ipv6-over-wireless to address Brian's
> suggestion (WiND->SND), and Ted's point of mDNS references. Plus a few nits.
>
> Left is Lorenzo's point of too much stuff for one document. It's
> effectively a 4-in-1, a problem statement (section 3), an
> architecture (section 4), a solution framework (section 5), and an
> applicability statement (section 6):
>
>    3.  Issues with IPv6 ND-Based Access  . . . . . . . . . . . . . .   5
>    4.  IPv6 over Non-Broadcast Networks Architecture . . . . . . . .  14
>    5.  IPv6 over Non-Broadcast Networks Framework for Stateful address
>    6.  SND Applicability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .  32
>
> So should we split? Will reviewing and pushing 4 small docs through IESG
> help?
>
> all the best
>
> Pascal
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> IETF IPv6 working group mailing list
> ipv6@ietf.org
> Administrative Requests: https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ipv6
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email