IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [irs-discuss] if-map example

Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org> Thu, 02 August 2012 21:33 UTC

Return-Path: <ping@pingpan.org>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFB9C11E80F5 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.976
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.976 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cj-c2-H3RnEb for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:33:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og106.obsmtp.com (exprod7og106.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.165]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 9164E11E80A2 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:33:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob106.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUBryNpCmjhrRLB9m+ykg59nEiVq3ZXBZ@postini.com; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:33:42 PDT
Received: by yenl2 with SMTP id l2so4274yen.33 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=VhGU4yVPrQsgp1DgVku+/nUq5+CAhXrk18kVAwi2JMk=; b=Wnlde1bKD+diJ806uBTtbv42BK6xkr/cZUZg2DkMc4i2AafX48GA43TCPaw3iDLG60 QdcF44QlCzC6lkMKP+EnQgQ/y029VfkM7Jb+QKezz4fzsEcFmuUFrToHpIST/zfc1o+x R+E4azc+6+Wx79CwsbbW0iEWOz/Sog7j0Va9iR6afrgbdgda5pg6mWJfwX1hA9CBuF+1 Ax3aO+U5+xN4/PoryBTD6VotbT7yVTRme/x9C/tBHhy1HnL5wJtieTuncCU4I4JQghq4 /aQtzlc9jBLAhP2bealCLpbux2S2Spzxp0HI/46pBZmgZsJsPseLIAYIWXjtwvBxOII1 mN9A==
Received: by 10.101.139.5 with SMTP id r5mr7078164ann.37.1343943221402; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:33:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gh0-f172.google.com (mail-gh0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id j10sm6643093anl.20.2012.08.02.14.33.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:33:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by ghbg16 with SMTP id g16so2353ghb.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.50.94.196 with SMTP id de4mr6200847igb.17.1343943219383; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:33:39 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.64.11.225 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 14:32:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <632FAE8B-8CC5-4701-BB42-1C4EACE372D5@gmail.com>
References: <632FAE8B-8CC5-4701-BB42-1C4EACE372D5@gmail.com>
From: Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 14:32:59 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM9otXwawWA72ROyLxPhRAyPZzWeiuGYvnQp=cd41ry7YfPMVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Pedro Roque Marques <pedro.r.marques@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="e89a8f234c07308de804c64f2a2f"
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk96dZ8a0iYNa86YQH9P2Sm1/p6Mqe/SmzOOmFh1sJ1UQJqJFjdXQ7g/cXdlft0CNX7IFwT
Cc: irs-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] if-map example
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 21:33:44 -0000

After playing around with a bunch of other schemes, this indeed is one of
the better ones to use as the base.

Ping

On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Pedro Roque Marques <
pedro.r.marques@gmail.com> wrote:

> As i pointed out in the RT area meeting, i believe that IF-MAP is a
> successful example of what can be achieved by network-wide schemas (vs
> network element schemas).
>
> The current spec is at:
>
> http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/files/resource_files/2888CAD9-1A4B-B294-D0ED95712B121FEF/TNC_IFMAP_v2_1r15.pdf
>
> if-map.org has lots of material on the use cases.
>
> As per my comment on the mic, i'd like to encourage the IRS to focus on
> data schemas that describe network state.
>
> thank you,
>   Pedro.
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email