Re: [irs-discuss] if-map example

Pedro Roque Marques <pedro.r.marques@gmail.com> Thu, 02 August 2012 22:18 UTC

Return-Path: <pedro.r.marques@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EEA7121E80C9 for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IGfhPsdXtEsf for <irs-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:18:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yx0-f172.google.com (mail-yx0-f172.google.com [209.85.213.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09ABC21E80CA for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Aug 2012 15:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by yenq13 with SMTP id q13so52338yen.31 for <irs-discuss@ietf.org>; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:mime-version:content-type:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :message-id:references:to:x-mailer; bh=YRHSuZEUxRsQwU1ZsLST4wMcjMdm5bol+0fZ20Wy66E=; b=eItGidbbCXOtZmDUsuZTQxyIqXsjiAyrrLbBj4U4BvANSaWWeF88/z4Z6ZuJMA6iU0 1OTOZQ6Ah323nHVZtV5bQcJ2AHoNRzUrCktYzjodhBu6Rave0PNhxW60iTyG3aTaY/K8 ltYtq6VS/XOr//734jmJWp95jepNadmp2YBVZK21AvlSJ/ceXSrrV0pu4nsE9m/qHi0m 9ZY7zkm8ST5Uvexnps2mjNl8XIZ+u15/KyiQLSPW//rCjAGTf03pYFgpUxQeJoJUn2KA qotTzDUl3yUdx8qBenZS7QorhmHiGDDvCvb4fzNpzEsFqFUmzF750r4Qim5NAMBktaf3 9mAA==
Received: by 10.50.188.201 with SMTP id gc9mr6309962igc.44.1343945922061; Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:18:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:df8::16:34c3:251a:4e51:754e? ([2001:df8:0:16:34c3:251a:4e51:754e]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id c3sm16247191iga.8.2012.08.02.15.18.40 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:18:41 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1278)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA5C9F41-5E30-475F-99B1-B04343980483"
From: Pedro Roque Marques <pedro.r.marques@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM9otXwawWA72ROyLxPhRAyPZzWeiuGYvnQp=cd41ry7YfPMVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 15:18:48 -0700
Message-Id: <443803C3-E36B-48C1-947D-8AEB19BE94C1@gmail.com>
References: <632FAE8B-8CC5-4701-BB42-1C4EACE372D5@gmail.com> <CAM9otXwawWA72ROyLxPhRAyPZzWeiuGYvnQp=cd41ry7YfPMVQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ping Pan <ping@pingpan.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1278)
Cc: irs-discuss@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [irs-discuss] if-map example
X-BeenThere: irs-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Interface to The Internet Routing System \(IRS\)" <irs-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/irs-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:irs-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss>, <mailto:irs-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Aug 2012 22:18:44 -0000

As an additional example, the following document describes a schema that can be used to provision a VPN (which is implemented by many PEs as individual VRFs).
http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-marques-l3vpn-schema

The document is still in its early stages.

The problems that can be solved by such a schema is to be able to, for instance:
1) Query the MAP database for all PEs where a specific VPN is present.
2) Ensure that the VRFs associated with a specific VPN consistently implement the same policy.

These are both examples of functionality that spans the network rather than be localized to a specific router/switch/appliance.

On Aug 2, 2012, at 2:32 PM, Ping Pan wrote:

> After playing around with a bunch of other schemes, this indeed is one of the better ones to use as the base.
> 
> Ping
> 
> On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Pedro Roque Marques <pedro.r.marques@gmail.com> wrote:
> As i pointed out in the RT area meeting, i believe that IF-MAP is a successful example of what can be achieved by network-wide schemas (vs network element schemas).
> 
> The current spec is at:
> http://www.trustedcomputinggroup.org/files/resource_files/2888CAD9-1A4B-B294-D0ED95712B121FEF/TNC_IFMAP_v2_1r15.pdf
> 
> if-map.org has lots of material on the use cases.
> 
> As per my comment on the mic, i'd like to encourage the IRS to focus on data schemas that describe network state.
> 
> thank you,
>   Pedro.
> _______________________________________________
> irs-discuss mailing list
> irs-discuss@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/irs-discuss
>