[Isis-wg] AD Review of draft-ietf-isis-prefix-attributes-09

[Alia Atlas <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

As is customary, I have done my AD review of this draft before progressing
it.
First, let me thank you for a well-written draft and the work you have put
into it.

Next, I believe that a revised version is needed.

1)  This draft has 7 authors.  The limit is 5; you can pick an editor if
you can't trim
down to 5.  I can, of course, listen to a clear write-up of contributions
made by each
author of this 7 page draft, if you feel that an exception is truly
warranted.   Until this
issue is addressed, I will not progress this draft.

2) The Security Considerations section is completely empty.  You know that
this
needs to be filled in - if only as a reference to the existing ISIS
security and a bit
on why sending additional information isn't a concern.

3)  As a minor kvetch (meaning that you don't have to agree), I'd prefer to
see
a bit of motivation or how this is expected to be used.  There's a very
small amount
of motivation from SR - but that doesn't really explain the need to send
the originating
Router ID.

4) Clarifying question:  When a prefix has the external prefix flag set and
the Router ID is sent, is that the Router ID of the router that is doing
the redistribution or of the original advertising router (if it were
available)?

If you can address these issues quickly, then I can issue an IETF Last Call
and we can have
it on the agenda for the Jan 7, 2016 telechat.  That means that I can issue
the IETF Last Call no later than Dec 17.

Thanks,
Alia