[Isis-wg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: (with COMMENT)

"Alissa Cooper" <alissa@cooperw.in> Tue, 03 May 2016 21:54 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alissa Cooper <alissa@cooperw.in>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20160503215409.8322.58425.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 14:54:09 -0700
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/isis-wg/Q1yCyCMBG8kgS3S_qKmCVmOQEv8>
Cc: draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag@ietf.org, chopps@chopps.org, isis-chairs@ietf.org, isis-wg@ietf.org
Subject: [Isis-wg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: (with COMMENT)

Alissa Cooper has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag-10: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-isis-node-admin-tag/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Agree with Alvaro's point #4. This seems like a bit of a weird statement
to make in an RFC; if updates to the other documents are expected then
maybe this document should say that?

[Isis-wg] Alissa Cooper's No Objection on draft-i… Alissa Cooper